On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:36, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Jim works on a machine:
Athlon64 3400+, with 1GB main memory, running SuSE 9.1 x86_64-linux.
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 17:57 -0700, James E Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 17:34, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > Another thing, has our library code base (libjava, libstdc++)
> > grown significantly lately?
>
> I was doing full builds, except for Ada. I should have mentioned that.
> Ada doesn't
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:36:17PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> [ tracking down sudden increase in bootstrap time ]
> So just so we are clear on the state:
>
> Jim works on a machine:
>
> Sees no difference in compile times from 03-29 -> 04-01
>
> Diego works on a machine
>
> Sees 50% differ
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 18:48 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:35:47AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:32, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:34:01PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > > > I'm rebooting the machine into the pr
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:35:47AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:32, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:34:01PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > > I'm rebooting the machine into the previous kernel right now to
> > > see if it changes things. Tomorrow
On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:32, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:34:01PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > I'm rebooting the machine into the previous kernel right now to
> > see if it changes things. Tomorrow's run will use kernel
> > 2.6.10-1.760_FC3.
>
> Well, it seem that the k
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:34:01PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> I'm rebooting the machine into the previous kernel right now to
> see if it changes things. Tomorrow's run will use kernel
> 2.6.10-1.760_FC3.
>
Well, it seem that the kernel had nothing to do with the problem.
Today's bootstrap ti
dnovillo wrote:
> [...]
> I rebooted the machine into a new kernel on 2005-03-31
> (2.6.10-1.770_FC3). The slowdown coincided with the box being
> rebooted into the new kernel:
> [...]
> 2005-03-305,704 <-- 2.6.10-1.760_FC3
> 2005-03-317,026 <-- 2.6.10-1.770_FC3
> [..
> I was doing full builds, except for Ada. I should have mentioned that.
> Ada doesn't get configured by default, and I haven't bothered to check
> why. I probably forgot to install the Ada compiler package.
Ada is not enabled by default, you need to include it explicitely,
e.g. --enable-langua
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 05:57:06PM -0700, James E Wilson wrote:
> So I think this is a possibility only if the Ada library got suddenly
> bigger and slower to compile, and if you are including Ada in your
> builds.
>
No Ada. I only build default languages. Oh, well, we'll see
what the timings lo
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 17:34, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Another thing, has our library code base (libjava, libstdc++)
> grown significantly lately?
I was doing full builds, except for Ada. I should have mentioned that.
Ada doesn't get configured by default, and I haven't bothered to check
why. I pr
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 03:08:50PM -0700, James E Wilson wrote:
> Is it possible that something changed on Diego's machine? Such as a new
> binutils, or a new kernel, etc?
>
Yes. I rebooted the machine into a new kernel on 2005-03-31
(2.6.10-1.770_FC3). The slowdown coincided with the box bei
Steven Bosscher wrote:
We have a bootstrap time regression since March 30. Bootstrap times
on Diego Novillo's SPEC box went up from (an already high) 5500s to
almost 8000s
I tried looking at this, but I haven't been able to find any bootstrap
time regressions. I've got a mainline tree checked o
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 22:49 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a bootstrap time regression since March 30. Bootstrap times
> on Diego Novillo's SPEC box went up from (an already high) 5500s to
> almost 8000s, see:
> http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/gcc/gcc-compiler-build-s
Hi,
We have a bootstrap time regression since March 30. Bootstrap times
on Diego Novillo's SPEC box went up from (an already high) 5500s to
almost 8000s, see:
http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/gcc/gcc-compiler-build-secs_elapsed.png
On IRC a patch possibly causing this regression was m
15 matches
Mail list logo
