On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 17:57 -0700, James E Wilson wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 17:34, Diego Novillo wrote: > > Another thing, has our library code base (libjava, libstdc++) > > grown significantly lately? > > I was doing full builds, except for Ada. I should have mentioned that. > Ada doesn't get configured by default, and I haven't bothered to check > why. I probably forgot to install the Ada compiler package.
Even if you installed the Ada compiler package you still would have to add ada to the configure line to build it. This decision was taken a while ago, I guess to be revisited at some point (main problem were hanging Ada tests, but some patches were proposed for this issue). > So I think this is a possibility only if the Ada library got suddenly > bigger and slower to compile, and if you are including Ada in your > builds. I bootstrap c,ada, make check, make install and I've seen no change on head in the past few weeks, it's around 1h36 on my Athlon 64 3000+. === GCCBOOT start === 2005-03-24 08:47:35 === GCCBOOT done === 2005-03-24 10:23:34 === GCCBOOT start === 2005-03-29 19:22:52 === GCCBOOT done === 2005-03-29 20:59:06 === GCCBOOT start === 2005-04-01 23:33:44 === GCCBOOT done === 2005-04-02 01:10:50 === GCCBOOT start === 2005-04-03 21:49:12 === GCCBOOT done === 2005-04-03 23:25:48 Laurent
