On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 02:10:36AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > I agree with that and plan to do so next week, once the server hosting
> > my GCC trees is online again.
>
> Before you go ahead with that, please check with overseers@; they
> (Frank
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 02:10:36AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Mike Stump wrote:
> > :-( I think we should remove all traces of any search that doesn't work.
>
> I agree with that and plan to do so next week, once the server hosting
> my GCC trees is online again.
Before
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Mike Stump wrote:
> :-( I think we should remove all traces of any search that doesn't work.
I agree with that and plan to do so next week, once the server hosting
my GCC trees is online again.
> It has never been any good, so I don't think it is a real loss.
This is not fa
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:20:39PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
>> If gmane is free, please supply me a set of the source code to the gmane
>> application, so that I can modify it and use it for my own purposes.
> http://gmane.org/dist.php
> The bit
Ranjit Mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes it does. If nothing else, the archives are used to
> provide canonical URLs for referring to messages.
gmane provides that too.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:20:39PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
> It shows! Your post is based on a misunderstanding of what "free" means in
> this context. Perhaps things will be clearer if you read the explanation of
> what the FSF means by "free" at
In return it shows that you didn't read the me
Will L (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
>> Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005
>
> I have been following this thread of discussion. I am a little puzzled.
It shows! Your post is based on a misunderstanding of what "free" means in
this context.
> Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005
I have been following this thread of discussion. I am a little puzzled. Google
and Gmail are both free but they are not "free" software according to the FSF
definition. But does it matter? We still use them for w
Yes it does. If nothing else, the archives are used to
provide canonical URLs for referring to messages.
What might not be clear is the need to run a search
engine on the sourceware server, especially if it
puts an awful load on the server at times and especially
when "foo bar site:gcc.gnu.org"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Per Abrahamsen wrote:
>
> Actually, I wonder if it really makes sense for the GCC project to
> spend part of their limited resources on maintaining their own mail
> archives, when specialized free as in FSF services like gmane exist?
Yes it does. If
Olly Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But note that Gmane (http://gmane.org) is run entirely on Free Software,
> and doesn't provide any non-Free Software downloads so you could
> presumably add a search box for that without political worries. (This
> may also be true for some of the other mai
mrs wrote:
> I think we should remove all traces of any search that doesn't work.
> [...]
We'll try to set up mnogosearch again on the machine. Please stand by.
- FChE
On Dec 14, 2005, at 9:30 AM, Olly Betts wrote:
It would be useful to at least note by the search box that it only
searches messages sent prior to May 2005.
:-( I think we should remove all traces of any search that doesn't
work. It doesn't help advanced people, and it doesn't help
beginne
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Could we put in a google search box on the archive pages at least, to
> > stop confusing people?
>
> Technically feasible but politically sensitive. Considering
> that links on readings.html to sites that provide some software
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:03:12PM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>>Summary of the thread: it's known about and may never be fixed, but
>>>alternative searchable archives exist (gmane, nabble, probably others
>>>like marc and mail-archive too).
>>
>>Could
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Summary of the thread: it's known about and may never be fixed, but
> > alternative searchable archives exist (gmane, nabble, probably
> > others like marc and mail-archive too).
>
> Could we put in a google search box on the archive pages at least, to
> s
> Summary of the thread: it's known about and may never be fixed, but
> alternative searchable archives exist (gmane, nabble, probably
> others like marc and mail-archive too).
Could we put in a google search box on the archive pages at least, to
stop confusing people?
http://www.google.com/sear
On 2005-12-14, Kaveh R. Ghazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think the mailing list archive search functionality is
> working. It's not showing any results after May 2005. Go to:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/
It was noted about a week ago (but ironically you couldn't search
for this threa
I don't think the mailing list archive search functionality is
working. It's not showing any results after May 2005. Go to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/
Type the name of any frequent contributor, oh say "rth" and sort by
"newest". I don't get anything after May 2005.
I tried several other lists
19 matches
Mail list logo
