>
>
> Dennis Clarke-2 wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
>>
>> Have you tried a bootstrap with neither ppl nor cloog ? I have yet to
>> see
>> their value and I generally exclude them. T
ersion/configure
thanks,
--nico
--
GNU/Linux on Power Architecture
CRUX PPC - http://cruxppc.org/
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/GCC-4.5.2-Release-Candidate-available-from-gcc.gnu.org-tp30405453p30432287.html
Sent from the gcc - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 14:42 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> A release candidate for GCC 4.5.2 is available from
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5.2-RC-20101208
>
> and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 167585.
>
> I have so far bootstrapped and tested the
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Richard Guenther writes:
>
> > The branch remains frozen and all checkins until after the final release
> > of GCC 4.5.2 require explicit RM approval.
>
> I'd like to get the following three testsuite-only patches into the
> branch if possible:
>
>
Richard Guenther writes:
> The branch remains frozen and all checkins until after the final release
> of GCC 4.5.2 require explicit RM approval.
I'd like to get the following three testsuite-only patches into the
branch if possible:
[v3] Don't create unlinkable 64-bit libtestc++.a on IR
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:16:23PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > >>
> > > > This was built against
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> > >>
>> > > This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
>> >
>> > Have you tried a bootstrap with neither
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > >>
> > > This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
> >
> > Have you tried a bootstrap with neither
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, David Fang wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there time to include the 4.5 backport patch for:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
>
> (is fixed on trunk, a 4.5.0 regression, 4.4.3 branch regression)
> The comments indicate that the patch is good to go for 4.5, but I
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> >>
>> > This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
>>
>> Have you tried a bootstrap with neither ppl nor cloog ? I have yet to
>> see
>> their v
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> >>
>> > This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
>>
>> Have you tried a bootstrap with nei
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >>
> > This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
>
> Have you tried a bootstrap with neither ppl nor cloog ? I have yet to see
> their value and I
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
> This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
Have you tried a bootstrap with neither ppl nor cloog ? I have yet to see
their value and I generally exclude them. This results ( thus far ) in
nice clean bootstrap bui
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> A release candidate for GCC 4.5.2 is available from
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5.2-RC-20101208
>
> and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 167585.
>
> I have so far bootstrapped and t
Hi,
Is there time to include the 4.5 backport patch for:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
(is fixed on trunk, a 4.5.0 regression, 4.4.3 branch regression)
The comments indicate that the patch is good to go for 4.5, but I didn't
see an entry log that it was actually comm
A release candidate for GCC 4.5.2 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5.2-RC-20101208
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 167585.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64-linux, bootstraps and tests on
{i686,ia64,pp
16 matches
Mail list logo
