On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > >> <snip wonderful work> > > > This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10. > > > > Have you tried a bootstrap with neither ppl nor cloog ? I have yet to see > > their value and I generally exclude them. This results ( thus far ) in > > nice clean bootstrap builds. > > > > Dennis, > Considering that distros like Fedora ship their gcc's with graphite > support built-in, allowing graphite to regress like this between gcc > maintenance releases doesn't seem like a very good idea.
The SUSE builds look fine. You have to investigate why it doesn't work for you, but it won't hold the 4.5.2 release. Are your ppl and cloog testsuite runs clean? Did you by chance build them with a different GCC release (and thus libstdc++)? Thanks, Richard. > Jack > > > > > -- > > Dennis Clarke > > dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris > > dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris > > > > -- Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> Novell / SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746 - GF: Markus Rex
