[patches] fine grained bounds checking patches for gcc 4.0.4 and 3.4.6

2007-05-13 Thread William Bader
I have updated the bounds checking patches for gcc 4.0.2 and 3.4.4 on http://sourceforge.net/projects/boundschecking/ My patches are available from http://williambader.com/bounds/example.html I have tested them under CentOS 4.4 Linux and Solaris/SPARC 10. The patches add a -fbounds-checking flag

GCC 4.0.4 Released

2007-02-03 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
I'm pleased to announce that GCC-4.0.4 has been released on January 31, 2007. This release is a minor release, containing bug fixes for regressions relative to earlier releases. It is the final release from the 4.0.x series, and the gcc-4_0-branch is now closed. GCC 4.0.4 is provide

GCC-4.0.4 prerelease

2007-01-29 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Hi, The tarballs for GCC-4.0.4 are available for download at ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.4-20070129/ Please download and test them. Baring any major problem, the final release will be made withing 3 days. And the GCC-4.0.x series will be definitely closed. -- Gaby

GCC-4.0.4

2007-01-27 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Please consider the GCC-4.0.4 as frozen. No non-documentation check-in is permitted. For documentation check-in, please consult with me first. Thanks, -- Gaby

Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status

2007-01-25 Thread Richard Guenther
e should also backport the fix for PR c++/28284 then, > | which is a two-liner. > I was primarily looking at the PRs that marked in the bugzilla > database blocker or critical. As there were over 256 PRs open, and > the idea is to get GCC-4.0.4 out of the door as soon as possible, I&

Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status

2007-01-25 Thread Volker Reichelt
ch is a two-liner. > I was primarily looking at the PRs that marked in the bugzilla > database blocker or critical. As there were over 256 PRs open, and > the idea is to get GCC-4.0.4 out of the door as soon as possible, I'm > not trying to fix everything; just those that are criti

Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status

2007-01-25 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Joe Buck wrote: | It might be worth fixing a couple of wrong-code bugs that are already | fixed in 4.1 and have very trivial fixes. I don't think it's wise, | though, to backport fixes from the 4.1 branch that are broken in 4.1.1 | unless there's a really strong justification

Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status

2007-01-25 Thread Joe Buck
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 05:42:31PM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote: > Hi, > > > There were over 250 PRs open against GCC-4.0.4. Almost all of > > them are "benign" in the sense that we can leave without fixing them > > in GCC-4.0.4 -- many are already fixed in

Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status

2007-01-25 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Richard Guenther wrote: | On 1/25/07, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Richard Guenther wrote: | > | > | You might want to consider middle-end/28651 given the recent integer overflow | > | discussions. | > | > Good suggestion! | > | > | I c

Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status

2007-01-25 Thread Richard Guenther
On 1/25/07, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Richard Guenther wrote: | You might want to consider middle-end/28651 given the recent integer overflow | discussions. Good suggestion! | I can do the backport work if you like. If you could work out a backport by to

Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status

2007-01-25 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Volker Reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, | | > There were over 250 PRs open against GCC-4.0.4. Almost all of | > them are "benign" in the sense that we can leave without fixing them | > in GCC-4.0.4 -- many are already fixed in more recent versions. | > I&#x

Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status

2007-01-25 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Richard Guenther wrote: | You might want to consider middle-end/28651 given the recent integer overflow | discussions. Good suggestion! | I can do the backport work if you like. If you could work out a backport by tomorrow morning (CST), that would would great. Thanks! --

Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status

2007-01-25 Thread Volker Reichelt
Hi, > There were over 250 PRs open against GCC-4.0.4. Almost all of > them are "benign" in the sense that we can leave without fixing them > in GCC-4.0.4 -- many are already fixed in more recent versions. > I'm now giving attention only to those PRs marked as b

Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status

2007-01-25 Thread Richard Guenther
On 25 Jan 2007 10:29:27 -0600, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, There were over 250 PRs open against GCC-4.0.4. Almost all of them are "benign" in the sense that we can leave without fixing them in GCC-4.0.4 -- many are already fixed in more recent versions

GCC-4.0.4 release status

2007-01-25 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Hi, There were over 250 PRs open against GCC-4.0.4. Almost all of them are "benign" in the sense that we can leave without fixing them in GCC-4.0.4 -- many are already fixed in more recent versions. I'm now giving attention only to those PRs marked as blocker or critical.