Jeff Law via Gcc writes:
> On 1/3/23 04:16, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
>> It seems that the default constructor of the non-POD poly-ints does
>> nothing. Is this intentional? I expected zero initialization, to match
>> regular ints.
> I think it was intentional. Richard Sandiford would know
On 1/3/23 04:16, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
It seems that the default constructor of the non-POD poly-ints does
nothing. Is this intentional? I expected zero initialization, to match
regular ints.
I think it was intentional. Richard Sandiford would know for sure. But
Martin Sebor might
It seems that the default constructor of the non-POD poly-ints does
nothing. Is this intentional? I expected zero initialization, to match
regular ints.
Thanks,
Florian