Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly

2023-11-16 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Wed, Nov 15 2023, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi! (adding gdb and binutils to the CC) > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 12:30:59AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 06:04:48PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: >> > I have inherited Martin Liška's buildbot script that checks that all >>

Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly

2023-11-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi! (adding gdb and binutils to the CC) On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 12:30:59AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 06:04:48PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: > > I have inherited Martin Liška's buildbot script that checks that all > > sorts of autotools generated files, mainly configure

Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly

2023-11-08 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Martin, On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 06:04:48PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: > I have inherited Martin Liška's buildbot script that checks that all > sorts of autotools generated files, mainly configure scripts, were > re-generated correctly when appropriate. While the checks are hopefully > useful,

Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly

2023-11-07 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc
Martin Jambor writes: > [...] I have inherited Martin Liška's buildbot script that checks > that all sorts of autotools generated files, mainly configure scripts, > were re-generated correctly when appropriate. [...] The gccadmin account on sourceware already does some daily routine git commit

Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly

2023-11-07 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 15:36, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hello, > > On Tue, Nov 07 2023, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > n>> On Nov 6, 2023, at 21:19, Christophe Lyon > wrote: > >> > >> Hi! > >> > >> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 18:05, Martin Jambor wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I have inherited Martin L

Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly

2023-11-07 Thread Martin Jambor
Hello, On Tue, Nov 07 2023, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: n>> On Nov 6, 2023, at 21:19, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 18:05, Martin Jambor wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have inherited Martin Liška's buildbot script that checks that all >>> sorts of autotools generat

Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly

2023-11-07 Thread Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
On 11/7/23 02:38, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: >> On Nov 6, 2023, at 21:19, Christophe Lyon >> wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 18:05, Martin Jambor >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have inherited Martin Liška's buildbot script that checks that >>> all sorts of autotools generated file

Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly

2023-11-06 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov via Gcc
> On Nov 6, 2023, at 21:19, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > Hi! > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 18:05, Martin Jambor wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have inherited Martin Liška's buildbot script that checks that all >> sorts of autotools generated files, mainly configure scripts, were >> re-generated correc

Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly

2023-11-06 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
Hi! On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 18:05, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hello, > > I have inherited Martin Liška's buildbot script that checks that all > sorts of autotools generated files, mainly configure scripts, were > re-generated correctly when appropriate. While the checks are hopefully > useful, they

Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly

2023-11-06 Thread Martin Jambor
Hello, I have inherited Martin Liška's buildbot script that checks that all sorts of autotools generated files, mainly configure scripts, were re-generated correctly when appropriate. While the checks are hopefully useful, they report issues surprisingly often and reporting them feels especially