Re: C++ Expression Template Benchmarks for GCC/Clang/Intel/PGI/MSVC

2012-06-20 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Walter Landry wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Walter Landry wrote: >>> Hello Everyone, >>> >>> I thought you might be interested in some C++ expression template >>> benchmarks I have done. >>> >>>  http://www.wlandry.net/Pro

Re: C++ Expression Template Benchmarks for GCC/Clang/Intel/PGI/MSVC

2012-06-19 Thread Walter Landry
Richard Guenther wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Walter Landry wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> >> I thought you might be interested in some C++ expression template >> benchmarks I have done. >> >>  http://www.wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor#Benchmarks >> >> I found that GCC optimized the exp

Re: C++ Expression Template Benchmarks for GCC/Clang/Intel/PGI/MSVC

2012-06-15 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Walter Landry wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I thought you might be interested in some C++ expression template > benchmarks I have done. > >  http://www.wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor#Benchmarks > > I found that GCC optimized the expression template code better than >

C++ Expression Template Benchmarks for GCC/Clang/Intel/PGI/MSVC

2012-06-14 Thread Walter Landry
Hello Everyone, I thought you might be interested in some C++ expression template benchmarks I have done. http://www.wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor#Benchmarks I found that GCC optimized the expression template code better than unrolling expressions by hand. In fact, GCC was far, far better at o