On 29 January 2010 11:09, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
>> Thus, what's the point of submitter fiddling with those Bugzilla
>> fields? Putting some sort of psychological pressure on people actually
>> working on fixing the bugs?
>
> Well, that's true when it comes to high prioritie
2010/1/29 Richard Earnshaw :
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:25 +, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 29/01/2010 12:02, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>
>> > We have three categories of users of BZ: RMs, Developers, and the rest.
>> > Developers are *not* the same as the rest and that extends beyond the
>> > abilit
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:25 +, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 29/01/2010 12:02, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> > We have three categories of users of BZ: RMs, Developers, and the rest.
> > Developers are *not* the same as the rest and that extends beyond the
> > ability to modify bug reports.
>
> Ah,
On 29/01/2010 12:02, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> We have three categories of users of BZ: RMs, Developers, and the rest.
> Developers are *not* the same as the rest and that extends beyond the
> ability to modify bug reports.
Ah, I may have overlooked something here; can the creator not adjust th
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:24 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Dave Korn
>> wrote:
>> > On 29/01/2010 11:03, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> >
>> >> This should ideally be documented in
>> >> http://gcc.gnu.o
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:26 +, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 29/01/2010 11:03, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > This should ideally be documented in
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html
>
> Both the way that page is named, and the way the link to it is indented
> under the link to the BZ front
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:24 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Dave Korn
> wrote:
> > On 29/01/2010 11:03, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> >> This should ideally be documented in
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html
> >
> > Both the way that page is named, a
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Dave Korn
wrote:
> On 29/01/2010 11:03, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> This should ideally be documented in
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html
>
> Both the way that page is named, and the way the link to it is indented
> under the link to the BZ frontpage i
Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Thus, what's the point of submitter fiddling with those Bugzilla
> fields? Putting some sort of psychological pressure on people actually
> working on fixing the bugs?
Well, that's true when it comes to high priorities, but the
submitter should have the opportunity to speci
On 29/01/2010 11:03, Richard Guenther wrote:
> This should ideally be documented in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html
Both the way that page is named, and the way the link to it is indented
under the link to the BZ frontpage in the side navbar on the gcc.gnu.org front
page, make it look
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Piotr Wyderski
wrote:
> Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
Only RMs may set priority.
>>>
>>> I beg your pardon? Where in the docs does it say that?
>>
>> I don't know that, but it's been discussed many times on this list.
>
> As a mere mortal I've used the priority s
Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Sure. Maybe it's also worth reminding that submitters don't need to add
> explicitly themselves in CC.
It's the reason I asked -- I've been recently removed from CC.
So thanks for explanation.
Best regards
Piotr Wyderski
On 29/01/2010 10:12, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> In PR target/42894 rguenth said:
>>> Only RMs may set priority.
>> I beg your pardon? Where in the docs does it say that?
>
> I don't know that, but it's been discussed many times on this l
On 01/29/2010 12:00 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> I can't see any reason on earth not to CC yourself to any bug that you
> have
> even a passing interest in monitoring progress with, and regularly do it
> myself. Nobody's ever complained.
>
Sure. Maybe it's also worth reminding that submitters don't n
On 29/01/2010 10:29, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Anyway, speaking of reporting bugs: what's the rule of
> specifying CCs? Especially to the submitter himself?
> I would like to be aware of the status of several bugs,
> so may I add myself to the CC list? Or is it supposed
> to be used only by the fixe
On 01/29/2010 11:09 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> In PR target/42894 rguenth said:
>
>> Only RMs may set priority.
>>
> I beg your pardon? Where in the docs does it say that?
>
Want to say two words about how I see these issues. Eventually, when the
time of releasing comes, only RMs, es
Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>> Only RMs may set priority.
>>
>> I beg your pardon? Where in the docs does it say that?
>
> I don't know that, but it's been discussed many times on this list.
As a mere mortal I've used the priority setting combo
a few times to specify (perceived) priority, which late
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> In PR target/42894 rguenth said:
>> Only RMs may set priority.
>
> I beg your pardon? Where in the docs does it say that?
I don't know that, but it's been discussed many times on this list.
Ciao!
Steven
In PR target/42894 rguenth said:
> Only RMs may set priority.
I beg your pardon? Where in the docs does it say that?
R.
19 matches
Mail list logo
