On 12/08/2009 10:54 AM, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> When has it changed? Could you please give
> a reference to some paper/discussion about it?
>
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2844.html
Just as an example...
Paolo.
Benjamin Redelings wrote:
> since lvalues no longer bind to rvalue references
When has it changed? Could you please give
a reference to some paper/discussion about it?
I'm asking, because my C++0x-based application
stopped to compile on newer 4.5-s and one of
the problems is mentioned above -- bu
2009/12/8 Benjamin Redelings I:
> Hi,
Hi,
I've CC'd the libstdc++ list, please reply there instead of the gcc list.
> It seems that many current uses of list::merge( ) fail to compile with
> -std=c++0x, but I don't see a bug in bugzilla for this. Itseems to result
> from:
>
> list<_Tp, _Alloc>::
Hi,
It seems that many current uses of list::merge( ) fail to compile
with -std=c++0x, but I don't see a bug in bugzilla for this. Itseems to
result from:
list<_Tp, _Alloc>::
#ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
merge(list&& __x)
#else
merge(list& __x)
#endif
For c++0x, don't we need BOTH vers
