Bug in GCC 4.5 c++0x version of std::list::merge(&&)?

[Benjamin Redelings I]

Hi,

It seems that many current uses of list<T>::merge( ) fail to compile 
with -std=c++0x, but I don't see a bug in bugzilla for this.  Itseems to 
result from:

list<_Tp, _Alloc>::
#ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
merge(list&& __x)
#else
merge(list& __x)
#endif

For c++0x, don't we need BOTH versions, since lvalues no longer bind to 
rvalue references, or am I missing something?

-BenRI