Re: broken link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for link to "Profile Mode" page:

On 5 August 2017 at 21:58, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> Thanks for letting us know, I've fixed the link. > > Thanks, Jonathan. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.1.0/libstdc++/manual/manual/profile_mode.html >

Re: broken link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for link to "Profile Mode" page:

On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Thanks for letting us know, I've fixed the link. Thanks, Jonathan. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.1.0/libstdc++/manual/manual/profile_mode.html ^ Should we do something about "manual

Re: broken link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for link to "Profile Mode" page:

On 2 August 2017 at 13:55, Sergei Kurenkov wrote: > Link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for "Profile Mode": > > * The libstdc++ Profile Mode has been deprecated and will be removed > in a future version. > > gives: > > Not Found > > The requested URL > /onlinedocs/gcc-7.1.0/lib

broken link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for link to "Profile Mode" page:

Link on this page https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html for "Profile Mode": * The libstdc++ Profile Mode has been deprecated and will be removed in a future version. gives: Not Found The requested URL /onlinedocs/gcc-7.1.0/libstdc++/manual/profile_mode.html was not found on this server.

Re: Broken Link

On 20 November 2015 at 13:12, wrote: > Hey, > > I wanted to reach out and let you know about this link which isn’t working - > http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/, I > found it on this page - > http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/.vhost/www.gnu.org/software/gcc/readings.html.

Broken Link

Hey, I wanted to reach out and let you know about this link which isn’t working - http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/, I found it on this page - http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/.vhost/www.gnu.org/software/gcc/readings.html. You’re link includes this text - "Objective

Re: broken link for Programming Languages Software Award on gcc homepage

Hi! On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:31:59 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: > the link for 'ACM SIGPLAN Programming Languages Software Award' in the news > list > on gcc.gnu.org is http://www.sigplan.org/node/231, as discussed here ( > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-06/msg00136.html ). > > Following the lin

broken link for Programming Languages Software Award on gcc homepage

Hi, the link for 'ACM SIGPLAN Programming Languages Software Award' in the news list on gcc.gnu.org is http://www.sigplan.org/node/231, as discussed here ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-06/msg00136.html ). Following the link gives me: ... Page Not Found The page you were looking for was no

Broken link on homepage

The “news” section first link points to "https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/“ which comes up “forbidden”. The other release links seem to be fine. paul

Re: broken link (and other issues) on the _contribute.html_ page

On Fri, 10 May 2013, Zvi Gilboa wrote: > On the _/contribute/.html_//page (http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html), the > link to the script that should help check conformance with GNU coding style is > broken (the root "trunk" is unknown, etc.) Thanks for the report, Zvi. I fixed this by means of th

Re: Broken link Extended-asm-with-goto.html#Extended-asm-with-goto in online HTML documentation

Hi Stephan, On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > the link of "Extended asm with goto" is > > > > to a non-existing > > > > which gets redirected as > > > > to a URL with non-matchi

Re: Broken link in gcc-4.8/changes.html

Hi Paolo, On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote: > I just noticed a broken link (in case the issue is trivial I may get > around to fixing it myself, but at the moment I don't know): > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/X86-Built-in-Functions.html#X86-Built-in-Function

Broken link Extended-asm-with-goto.html#Extended-asm-with-goto in online HTML documentation

Not sure if it is already known, but noticed that at least in the online HTML documentation for all versions since 4.5 (where it was apparently introduced), at in the paragraph Speaking of labels, jumps from one asm to another

broken link (and other issues) on the _contribute.html_ page

Greetings, On the _/contribute/.html_//page (http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html), the link to the script that should help check conformance with GNU coding style is broken (the root "trunk" is unknown, etc.) Note also that the section "Legal Prerequisites" comes before "Coding Standards." L

Broken link in gcc-4.8/changes.html

Hi, I just noticed a broken link (in case the issue is trivial I may get around to fixing it myself, but at the moment I don't know): http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/X86-Built-in-Functions.html#X86-Built-in-Functions (it appers twice) Cheers, Paolo.

Re: Broken link

2011/12/5 Jonathan Wakely: > 2011/12/5 Marco Antonio Gómez Martín: >>        Hello, >> >>        Just to let you know that I have found some broken links at >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html >> >>        The table entries: >> >> Defining move special member functions  N3053   GCC 4.6 >>

Re: Broken link

2011/12/5 Marco Antonio Gómez Martín: >        Hello, > >        Just to let you know that I have found some broken links at > > http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html > >        The table entries: > > Defining move special member functions  N3053   GCC 4.6 > Allowing move constructors to throw [no

Broken link

Hello, Just to let you know that I have found some broken links at http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html The table entries: Defining move special member functions N3053 GCC 4.6 Allowing move constructors to throw [noexcept] N3050 GCC 4.6 (core language only) h

Re: [gnu.org #456639] broken link in libstdc++ manual online

2009/6/23 Rob Myers via RT: >> >> In the page of the libstdc++ manual about the API documentation: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/api.html >> the link to "the latest collection" goes to a "404 Not Found" > > Hi. > > I'm forwarding you this email that was assigned to gnu webmasters for >

[gnu.org #456639] broken link in libstdc++ manual online

> [spoon.reloa...@gmail.com - Sun Jun 21 16:20:11 2009]: > > In the page of the libstdc++ manual about the API documentation: > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/api.html > the link to "the latest collection" goes to a "404 Not Found" Hi. I'm forwarding you this email that was assigned to

PATCH for Re: "Host/Target specific installation notes for GCC": broken link

On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Dennis Schridde wrote: > The page on "Host/Target specific installation notes for GCC" > (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html) has a broken link. > In the table of contents it links to > "http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#x-x-mingw"

"Host/Target specific installation notes for GCC": broken link

Hi! The page on "Host/Target specific installation notes for GCC" (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html) has a broken link. In the table of contents it links to "http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#x-x-mingw";, while "http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.ht

Re: MAINTAINERS update (was: [wwwdocs] java/projects.html -- remove broken link)

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I'm wondering how many other entries in our MAINTAINERS file are affected. > Perhaps we ought to send a test message to all and see what comes back? > Thoughts? If we update bouncing MAINTAINERS addresses, we should also update the gcc-maintainers mai

Re: MAINTAINERS update (was: [wwwdocs] java/projects.html -- remove broken link)

> Anyone knows how to update the following in MAINTAINERS? > > libgcj Bryce McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The reason I am asking is that I just got > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: > 550 5.2.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Mailbox disabl

MAINTAINERS update (was: [wwwdocs] java/projects.html -- remove broken link)

Anyone knows how to update the following in MAINTAINERS? libgcj Bryce McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason I am asking is that I just got <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550 5.2.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Mailbox disabled for this reci

Broken link for Modula-3 front end.

Here is a minute tidbit. When I click on the Modula-3 link: http://www.m3.org/ it rolls over to: http://www.igencorp.com/igencorp/ Ii looks like they moved to: http://www.modula3.org/ Ed Smith-Rowland

Re: Broken link to documentation

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Simon Wright wrote: > In http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/, the Current development / User-Level > Documentation link to GNAT User's Guide is broken. This is a known issue with the subversion conversion of update_web_docs. I have given my conjectured cause as being that the SV

Broken link to documentation

In http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/, the Current development / User- Level Documentation link to GNAT User's Guide is broken.