> For critical things I did just what -frtl-abstract-sequences did (along
> with some hand optimizing) and I've seen performance improvements of 50%
> and more just by getting my working set of code to fit into the cache-size.
>
> Once the feature is removed: Will there ever be any chance that t
Diego Novillo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:23, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Edelsohn wrote:
It currently is broken on many platforms. Why not remove it now? What is
the purpose of keeping a pass that does not work correctly and developers
cannot use?
As
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:23, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>> It currently is broken on many platforms. Why not remove it now? What is
>> the purpose of keeping a pass that does not work correctly and developers
>> cannot use?
>
> I agree with David.
Works
David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This option has been problematic and does not seem to be well
>> maintained. In terms of usefulness, it would also be worth
>> implementing as a gimple pass, ideally in IPA mode. I propose that we
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 21:19, Weddington, Eric
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you also proposing to do the re-implementation as you describe above (as
> a gimple pass, in IPA mode)?
Not necessarily, but it's a possibility. Initially I'm more
interested in removing code that is not useful and
> -Original Message-
> From: Diego Novillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:56 AM
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [RFC] Remove -frtl-abstract-sequences in 4.5
>
> This option has been problematic and does not seem to be well
>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This option has been problematic and does not seem to be well
> maintained. In terms of usefulness, it would also be worth
> implementing as a gimple pass, ideally in IPA mode. I propose that we
> remove it at the next st
This option has been problematic and does not seem to be well
maintained. In terms of usefulness, it would also be worth
implementing as a gimple pass, ideally in IPA mode. I propose that we
remove it at the next stage 1, at least it will stop causing problems.
Thoughts?
Diego.
