David Edelsohn wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This option has been problematic and does not seem to be well >> maintained. In terms of usefulness, it would also be worth >> implementing as a gimple pass, ideally in IPA mode. I propose that we >> remove it at the next stage 1, at least it will stop causing problems.
> It currently is broken on many platforms. Why not remove it now? What is > the purpose of keeping a pass that does not work correctly and developers > cannot use? I agree with David. Code that is known-broken, not known-useful, and which nobody has plans to fix should just be removed ASAP; it's just a hazard to users. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
