Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Mark, how does this port fit in the 4.1 plan? Since it is totally
self-contained (it does not modify anything in GCC proper but the usual
configuration additions), I think it could be merged any time, assuming a
global maintainer can spend some time on a review. To be fair, thi
Konark Goel, Noida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We submitted a patch for a new port for MAXQ architecture.
> The original patch is
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg02138.html)
> The revised patch after incorporating few comments is
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg
