Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers

2005-10-01 Thread Mike Kumbera
To recap the current state as far as I know it: The disclaimers I sent in for both Asher Langton and myself were the same wording as the one from Christoper Michael Chambreau. We did that to make it easier to get the GNU Assignment. :-) Secondly, the letter I sent to the copyright clerk containe

Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers

2005-09-30 Thread David Edelsohn
> Steve Kargl writes: Steve> If you review the emails in fortran@ for the few months, you'll find Steve> that the copyright clerk has acknowledged receiving a disclaimer from Steve> Asher. This clerk probably discarded it because it was not a FSF approved Steve> assignment. In addition, sev

Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers

2005-09-30 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:10:01PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > > Steven Bosscher writes: > > Steven> On Friday 30 September 2005 21:36, Asher Langton wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> > Asher, > >> >Any progress on the paperwork? > >> > >> None. I haven't recei

Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers

2005-09-30 Thread David Edelsohn
> Steven Bosscher writes: Steven> On Friday 30 September 2005 21:36, Asher Langton wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Jack Howarth wrote: >> > Asher, >> >Any progress on the paperwork? >> >> None. I haven't received anything from the FSF. I just pinged them >> again. The FSF does have a di

Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers

2005-09-30 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:01:53PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Friday 30 September 2005 21:36, Asher Langton wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > Asher, > > >Any progress on the paperwork? > > > > None. I haven't received anything from the FSF. I just pinged them >

Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers

2005-09-30 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Friday 30 September 2005 21:36, Asher Langton wrote: > On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Asher, > >Any progress on the paperwork? > > None. I haven't received anything from the FSF. I just pinged them > again. The FSF does have a disclaimer from LLNL, which seems like it > shou