To recap the current state as far as I know it:
The disclaimers I sent in for both Asher Langton and myself were the same wording as the one from Christoper Michael Chambreau. We did that to make it easier to get the GNU Assignment. :-) Secondly, the letter I sent to the copyright clerk contained three items. From past emails it appears all this made it to the FSF. A LLNL disclaimer for Asher Langton. A LLNL disclaimer for Michael Kumbera. An unsigned assignment form filled out for Michael Kumbera. (I cannot sign that as a LLNL Employee.) Is there more information needed to get MY assignment? I understand Asher still needs to send in the assignment forms to go with his disclaimer from LLNL. Asher is currently TRYING to get his assignment paperwork. Once that gets to him do I have to get Lab Legal produce a NEW origional disclaimer letters and send everything in again? Mike On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 03:30:32PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:10:01PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > > >>>>> Steven Bosscher writes: > > > > Steven> On Friday 30 September 2005 21:36, Asher Langton wrote: > > >> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Jack Howarth wrote: > > >> > Asher, > > >> > Any progress on the paperwork? > > >> > > >> None. I haven't received anything from the FSF. I just pinged them > > >> again. The FSF does have a disclaimer from LLNL, which seems like it > > >> should be sufficient, according to: > > >> > > >> http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#legal > > > > Steven> Can someone with access to these FSF lists check if this is correct? > > > > The disclaimer specifically is for Christoper Michael Chambreau. > > It cannot be applied to anyone else. > > If you review the emails in fortran@ for the few months, you'll find > that the copyright clerk has acknowledged receiving a disclaimer from > Asher. This clerk probably discarded it because it was not a FSF approved > assignment. In addition, several of us on fortran@ have tried to get > the copyright issues resolved in this matter. It is amazing to see the > level of incompetency displayed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > Steve
