Hello Jakub,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 10:26:27AM -0400, y2s1982 . wrote:
> > Still, following the documentation 5.5.2.1, how should I extract version
> > information from ompd_address_space_context_t that is owned by the
> > debugger instead
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 10:26:27AM -0400, y2s1982 . wrote:
> Still, following the documentation 5.5.2.1, how should I extract version
> information from ompd_address_space_context_t that is owned by the
> debugger instead of the OMPD to check for compatibility , especially
> when it is not currentl
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 10:06 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:58:49PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote:
> > This is giving me more clarity on what I have to do. At the moment, I am
> > storing the
> > information in the handle.
> >
> > I do have one problem: in 5.5.2.1 (
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:58:49PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote:
> This is giving me more clarity on what I have to do. At the moment, I am
> storing the
> information in the handle.
>
> I do have one problem: in 5.5.2.1 (
> https://www.openmp.org/spec-html/5.0/openmpsu214.html#x270-18090005.5.2
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:12 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 10:57:11AM -0400, y2s1982 . wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:50:44PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote:
> > > > per-process functions defined in 5.5.2.
> > > > I have some questions on defining or at least using so
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 10:57:11AM -0400, y2s1982 . wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:50:44PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote:
> > > per-process functions defined in 5.5.2.
> > > I have some questions on defining or at least using some of the data
> > types.
> >
> > The standard makes those inte
Hello,
Thank you for the detailed reply. I have some questions.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:47 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:50:44PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote:
> > per-process functions defined in 5.5.2.
> > I have some questions on defining or at least using some of th
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:50:44PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote:
> per-process functions defined in 5.5.2.
> I have some questions on defining or at least using some of the data types.
The standard makes those intentionally not defined, it is up to the
implementation to put in there whatever is
Hello,
In addition to the per-library process, I am trying to implement OMPD's
per-process functions defined in 5.5.2.
I have some questions on defining or at least using some of the data types.
In the attached patch, I took a liberty of tentatively defining the
_ompd_aspace_handle, which is the