myself and I am not
interested in becoming its maintainer -- I just happen to know
someone who uses it and noticed that GCC was broken.
--
Samuel Tardieu -- s...@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
BI variant, so very few multilibs are required for a functional
Paul> toolchain.
I have had problem in the past with Cortex M3 based processors because
libraries were not compiled with the Thumb-2 instruction set (which is
the only one supported by those ARM CPUs) variant.
Sam
--
Sa
* Alexandre Pereira Nunes [2009-05-08 11:24:14
-0300]
| > Don't you already get this if you created a toolchain with
| > --with-arch=armv7-m and the multilib for thumb ? A toolchain configured for
| > --with-arch=armv7-m and the multilib for thumb would automatically cover
| > this configuration
nnaly compile the thumb2 version of the library in
4.5.0 and 4.4.1?
If people don't want it, could we add an option to enable thumb2 at
configure time?
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- s...@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
ore lucky than most of us then :)
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- s...@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
exercized for years and can simply be removed.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
others have
Thomas> used this method on some cross targets.
Do you mean --with-build-sysroot?
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
On 24/04, Christopher Faylor wrote:
| In case it isn't obvious, I don't know how to fix this.
Well, I guess it fixed itself then since it's now working again :)
om the gcc-cvs
Christopher> mailing list.
Christopher> We'll be monitoring the system to see if there is a load
Christopher> hit. If so, we'll probably drop back to Dan's original
Christopher> method.
It looks like the GIT repository hasn't been synced since yesterd
>>>>> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Charlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arnaud> Yes, libgnalasup is a bundled version of lapack/blas
Arnaud> libraries.
Thanks. I've submitted a patch to make lapack/blas the default
version.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
can replace the reference in GCC
i-forbla.adb by references to liblapack and libblas instead. Would
that be functionally equivalent?
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
On 18/04, Christopher Faylor wrote:
| After consultation with Dan, I have set things up on gcc.gnu.org so that
| the git repository is updated every time an email message is received
| from the gcc-cvs mailing list.
Great! Thanks to both of you.
On 18/04, Daniel Berlin wrote:
| I know you think this is personal, as per your email below, but it really
isn't.
| I had it set up to do it after every commit, and it drove our load
| average up a noticeable amount.
| As such, I stopped doing it and set it to run every 30 minutes.
|
| > I know
On 18/04, Daniel Berlin wrote:
| > However, having it synced periodically rather than after every commit is
| > an annoyance.
|
| True, but it won't change anytime soon because it would place more
| load, and require more locking (since there is no guarantee a git sync
| will finish before the
On 18/04, Daniel Berlin wrote:
| > how is the GIT repository synced? Is there a hook which updates it
| > after a svn commit?
|
| No.
| It is synced every 30 minutes.
|
| >
| > I'm about to switch from infradead to gcc.gnu.org, and I want to make
| > sure that the latter is synced at least a
is the GIT repository synced? Is there a hook which updates it
after a svn commit?
I'm about to switch from infradead to gcc.gnu.org, and I want to make
sure that the latter is synced at least as frequently as the former
before I do that.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
nd.
This way, branches will be kept under /refs/heads/, not put under
/refs/remotes/.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
n the MAINTAINERS file, as AFAIK every MAINTAINERS as a @gcc.gnu.org
address.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
On 20/03, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
| Maybe that's partly because you are not following closely the development of
| GCC and are not familiar with the GCC stages. Submitting patches during
| stage3 (in particular end of stage3) is not really the most appropriate time,
| so it's often better to wait fo
On 20/03, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
| > Since 2007-12-19, which is the date of the latest AdaCore batch
| > merge (three months ago), the Ada front end has only received the
| > following patches:
| >
| > - platform-specific and build-related patches
| >
| > - gigi (Ada structures -> GCC structu
Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> I cannot seem to find an answer to this PING message from last
> December.
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] ada: Do not let a type in an aggregate be an ancestor
> > of itself
> > Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:43:44 +0100
> > URL: http:
>>>>> "Bernardo" == Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bernardo> If people think it would be useful, we could install a commit
Bernardo> hook on gcc.gnu.org to mirror each commit immediately.
It would be great!
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
>>>>> "Schmave" == Schmave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i was wondering what steps i need to take to port gcc to a new
> architecture
Did you find something unclear in the GCC documentation? Do you have a
specific question?
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [E
>>>>> "JCP" == J C Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JCP> I want to see a comparison of performances between 4.1.x, 4.2.x
JCP> and 4.4.x to know how they have been evolved.
What prevents you from doing the comparaison yourself using SVN?
Sam
--
Samuel
p
0018 <_ZN1T3fooEv>:
18: 8b 44 24 04 mov0x4(%esp),%eax
1c: c7 00 07 00 00 00 movl $0x7,(%eax)
22: c3 ret
The constructor seems to be included twice with the very same code. Is
that expected?
Sam
--
Samuel Ta
checked out copy of trunk using SVN requires 1.2G, and
I don't have any history around...
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
platform using some barely
used debugging format, this could give a hint of where to look (STABS
for example) to see how it is done there and if bogus assumptions were
made about the previous behaviour.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
Sam> How could a newcomer guess why the gcc_force_collect flag needs to
Sam> be reset?
Andreas> That is supposed to be written in a comment. The change log
Andreas> entry should describe _what_ is being changed, so that you
Andreas> can find out when a particular change was made.
Out of curiosit
On 2/12, Eric Botcazou wrote:
| > I know this document and I think the part on ChangeLog doesn't achieve
| > its purpose:
| >
| > http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Change-Logs
| >
| >Keep a change log to describe all the changes made to program source
| >files. The purpose
On 2/12, Andreas Schwab wrote:
| That is supposed to be written in a comment. The change log entry
| should describe _what_ is being changed, so that you can find out when a
| particular change was made.
This should be the job of the VCS, e.g. "svn log" and "svn blame".
Moreover, ChangeLogs are
On 2/12, Eric Botcazou wrote:
| He indeed cannot, but the ChangeLog is not meant to make it possible either.
| See http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html, especially the GNU Coding Standards.
I know this document and I think the part on ChangeLog doesn't achieve
its purpose:
http://www.gnu.org/prep
As a recent committer to GCC, I am always surprised to see the content
of ChangeLog entries and commit messages.
I tend to find GCC ChangeLog entries useless. For example, the more
recent ChangeLog entry in gcc/ChangeLog is:
| 2007-11-30 Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| * ggc-common
On 1/12, Robert Dewar wrote:
>> I cannot see a reason not to use "orb $32,y" here instead of a three
>> steps read/modify/write operation. Is this only a missed optimization?
>> (in which case I will open a PR)
>
> Are you sure it is an optimization, the timing on these things is
> very subtle. W
$16, x
orl $32, %eax
movb%al, y
ret
I cannot see a reason not to use "orb $32,y" here instead of a three
steps read/modify/write operation. Is this only a missed optimization?
(in which case I will open a PR)
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTE
;
UINT32 b = a;
printf ("a+b = 0x%016llx\n", (UINT64) (a+b));
return 0;
}
The output will be:
a+b = 0xfffe
instead of your expected
a+b = 0x0001fffe
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
sbbl$-1, %eax
movl%eax, a
There is clearly a race condition if you have multiple threads
executing this code even if only one thread has "locked" being true.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
On 27/10, Robert Dewar wrote:
> I don't understand, are we looking at the same example, the example
> from Sam that I looked at did not have an entry body, so how could the
> entry body rule apply?
Let's look at the example (where I replaced protected procedures by
entries with a guard which is a
On 27/10, Florian Weimer wrote:
| (I can't reproduce the conditional store with my GCC 4.2 installation,
| though.)
You need "-O -fno-inline" to trigger it on this particular example
(you don't need "-fno-inline" if you put "Lock" in a separate package).
(test == 0);" */
Would a patch such as the following be acceptable?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/151261
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
>>>>> "Sam" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sam> In the following example, is the access to "Shared" considered
Sam> unsynchronized even though what looks like a proper lock is used
Sam> around it?
Call to Always_Unlock was incorre
On 26/10, Robert Dewar wrote:
| Of course in Ada there is a clear notion of threads semantic, and
| a clear definition of what the meaning of code is in the presence
| of threads, so the specific situation discussed here is easy to
| deal with (though Ada takes the view that unsychronized shared a
now just to check if the conditional memory operation cases
David> trigger here too.
It doesn't because you have the spin_unlock() in the "then" part so it
is no longer a single assignment (the only case that gets "optimized"
currently).
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
On 25/10, Andrew Pinski wrote:
| On 10/25/07, Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > With yesterday's SVN sources, the following source produces the same
| > result with -ftree-cselim and -fno-tree-cselim on x86:
|
| Because another patch does this optimization, the
dl$12, %esp
ret
Shouldn't the conditional store be preserved when -fno-tree-cselim is
set?
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
44 matches
Mail list logo
