of OMP to IL, ( thins of variables and such, I might be wrong but I
think
we perhaps can do the same thing a bit easier ).
/ regards, Lars Segerlund.
On Tue, 3 May 2005 16:42:47 -0400
Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have started working on connecting Dmitry's OpenM
t archives.
Anyhow, gcc need's to get faster, and it needs to use less memory, perhaps it
shouldn't be a goal in itself, but it must be desirable, and 'on' the radar.
The above are my opinions, feel free to disagree,
/ regards, Lars Segerlund.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005
ficient if
possible.
Perhaps it's possible to graft some kind of indexing scheme on the worst
offenders,
so that some O(n^2) can get to O(1 ) or something.
The main problem seem's to be that almost any efforts to point out a single
scapegoat
have not been very successful.
/ rega
btw. what Wiki ??
/ Lars Segerlund
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:22:11 + (UTC)
"Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to commit my new C parser to mainline today once it is confirmed
> that the 4.0 branch has been created and after final testing against
rovement in the next release, ( from the mailinglist ).
/ regards, Lars Segerlund.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:32:18 -0500
Paul Schlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Out of curiosity, although svn certainly seems attractive, are there any
> concerns observing that:
>
> - ironically it see
