Are you just I'll informed or plain ..... ? ( Sorry if it comes off a bit rough ).
Subversion have been self hosting since a year or more, and as for significant other projects apache is one :-) ... You could have googled a bit before blurting out obviously false statements. A good place to start would be www.tigris.org where svn is hosted, ( and also contains all the other information you talk about ), the query on google was 'subversion homepage'. The main complaint on svn seem's to be a slow blame command, which is being worked on and has some improvement in the next release, ( from the mailinglist ). / regards, Lars Segerlund. On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:32:18 -0500 Paul Schlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Out of curiosity, although svn certainly seems attractive, are there any > concerns observing that: > > - ironically it seems that the svn isn't itself under svn control but cvs? > Has svn ever been relied upon for a significant open source project? > > - there doesn't seem to be an analogous svn web-based viewer? Is one > planned to be available in the timeframe being considered for gcc use? > > - would the intend be to pull the entire unified tree (i.e. binutils, etc.) > under svn? If not, might that create some potential complications? > > - is the svn client sw known to be cleanly build-able, reasonably robust. > and secure on all likely significant client platforms? > > (just curious, as it wasn't obvious after some basic research?) > > >
