"Eric Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seems the question has been solved, here is the changes of
> treelang/parse.y, just for fun :-)
>
> $ diff treelang/parse.y treelang/parse_new.y -u
> --- treelang/parse.y2004-01-08 15:50:46.0 +0800
> +++ treelang/parse_new.y2006-04-13
Alexey Starovoytov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> The default architecture for GCC SPARC is V7.
> What do gcc sparc developers think about changing it to V8PLUS?
>
> Few things to consider:
> - v7 is legacy
> . used in old Sun's sun4c systems
> . 32-bit only
> . no integer mul
Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sep 5, 2005, at 6:39 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 02:27:54PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>>> (insn 31 29 49 5 (set (mem/s/j:SI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 47 [ env ])
>>> (const_int 4 [0x4])) [0 .ex+0 S4 A32])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) writes:
> [Sorry for the missing line in my last message.]
>
> I'm watching it deal with
>
> # small_1 = PHI <32(0), 1(1)>
>
> vrp_meet is called with [32, 32] and [1,1].
>
> It determines that the ranges don't intersect and then comes up with
> ~[
shreyas krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi every one,
> Can some one please answer this. How do I get a tree node from
> an exisiting symbol for use in the LHS of a expression ? example a=10;
>
> thanks
> shrey
I don't really know what your asking but in a = is the the 1st operan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) writes:
> Sorry it took me so long to get to this.
>
> > You're not showing where this comes from, so it's hard to say. However
> > D.1480 is created by the gimplifier, not the Ada front end. There could
> > easily be a typing problem in the tree
Rafael Espíndola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello~ every one :)
> >
> > I'm a new guy in gcc mailing list
> > I've been studying gcc for 2 months.
> > I read "GNU compiler collection internals" (for GCC 3.5.0?),
Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, it's still the rule :-) and we have about 10,000 test directories
> now, many with a lot of code (it's many millions of lines in all, a
> good thing that machines are getting faster). In fact our test suite
> seems to take somewhat over an hour to e
The form is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-06/msg02298.html
If you have any questions feel free to ask.
--
Thanks,
Jim
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~ja2morri/
http://phython.blogspot.com
http://open.nit.ca/wiki/?page=jim
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Em Sun 12 Jun 2005 23:58, James A. Morrison escreveu:
> > Was there anything in particular that you found hard to understand in the
> > treelang frontend. It is supposed to be the example/tutorial front-end.
> One
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Two colleagues (Rafael Dantas de Castro and Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri) and I
> decided to try to make a scheme frontend for gcc. Since the task is proving
> quite difficult we decided to write a very small frontend that could be used
> as
Milind Katikar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I was using gcc 2.9 (host - i386-pc-cygwin, target √
> sparclet-aout). Recently I have started using gcc 3.2
> (same host and target) primarily to ge the benefit of
> size reduction optimizations in gcc. However I
> observed increase in siz
Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> > Peter Barada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I've got a "Using and Porting GNU CC" manual for rev 2.95, and am
> >> looking around for a newer one and can't find it anywhere. Does
> >> anyone know if a newer printed manua
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jack Howarth) writes:
>Even if there were complete g77 compatibility in g95, folks may want
> to stick with the g77 version from gcc 3.4 for awhile purely for
> performance reasons. In doing some test runs of the APBS
> Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver program, I discover
"Douglas Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the status of Objective-C++ support in mainline GCC? Ziemowit Laski
> was
> working on integrating such support late last year, but has Apple since
> halted
> such integration efforts?
>
> Douglas
I'm sure integrating Obj-C++ wil
Marek Krzyzowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello
>
> I appreciate your work and do not want to bother you, but I hope, that
> somebody will send me some helpful answer on my question. Is anyone can send
> me his 'specs' file (contains configuration for working compiler) ??
> (this is stand
Rene Rebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm just doing the first benchmarking with the 4.0.0 pre release
> (20050319) and just noticed that -O0 build time is not always the
> fastest. (In contrast to what the changes suggest: "When compiling
> without optimizations (-O0), the C++ fro
Ed Smith-Rowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 1 Mar 2005 at 8:17, James A. Morrison wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've decided I'm going to try to take the time and cleanup and
> > update
> > the
> > Pascal frontend for gcc and try it get i
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> James A. Morrison wrote:
>
> > I made this post, with my changes posted, to see if I would get any
> > support.
>
> I'd also suggesting contacting the GCC SC to see what their reaction
> would be.
That
Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mar 01, 2005 02:17 PM, James A. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've decided I'm going to try to take the time and cleanup and update the
> > Pascal frontend fo
Hi,
I've decided I'm going to try to take the time and cleanup and update the
Pascal frontend for gcc and try it get it integrated into the upstream source.
I'm doing this because I wouldn't like to see GPC work with GCC 4+.
I don't care at all at supporting GPC on anything less than GCC 4.1 so
21 matches
Mail list logo
