On 3/8/24 5:28 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 22:35, Frank Scheiner via Gcc wrote:
>>
>> On 08.03.24 23:00, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>> On 3/8/24 7:16 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
I CCed Jeff who is on the commitee to forward the maintainer proposal
though I guess t
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 22:35, Frank Scheiner via Gcc wrote:
>
> On 08.03.24 23:00, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > On 3/8/24 7:16 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> >> I CCed Jeff who is on the commitee to forward the maintainer proposal
> >> though I guess this will not go forward as a first step. Inst
Snapshot gcc-12-20240308 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20240308/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On 08.03.24 23:00, Peter Bergner wrote:
On 3/8/24 7:16 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
I CCed Jeff who is on the commitee to forward the maintainer proposal
though I guess this will not go forward as a first step. Instead
you are probably expected to show activity on the port, for example
pos
On 3/8/24 5:30 AM, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> Patches should be sent to the gcc-patches list instead of this one,
> and should be against trunk not an old gcc-11 RC. See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches for more details - thanks!
And you need to CC the rs6000/powerpc port mainta
On 3/8/24 7:16 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> I CCed Jeff who is on the commitee to forward the maintainer proposal
> though I guess this will not go forward as a first step. Instead
> you are probably expected to show activity on the port, for example
> post the patch series to make ia64 use
Hello,
I have been trying to understand the higher level structure of g++,
so I have been reading the source code. I'm not sure about some
things and asked the dev irc channel. There I was recommended to ask
them here so:
1) Is there some reason, why following language hook definitions
have no
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024, Ren? Rebe wrote:
>
> > On Mar 7, 2024, at 20:08, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> >> Am 07.03.2024 um 19:09 schrieb Ren? Rebe :
> >>
> >> Hey there,
> >>
> >> I saw the deprecation of ia64*-*-* scrolling by [1].
> >>
> >> Which surprised me, as (minor bugs aside) gcc ia64*-*-
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 11:27, Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> This might not be the best timing -short before a major release-,
> however, Sam just commented on the bug I filled years ago [1], so here
> we go:
>
> Glibc uses .machine to determine assembler optimizations to use.
> However, since reworking the
This might not be the best timing -short before a major release-,
however, Sam just commented on the bug I filled years ago [1], so here
we go:
Glibc uses .machine to determine assembler optimizations to use.
However, since reworking the rs6000 .machine output selection in
commit e154242724b084380
> On Mar 7, 2024, at 20:08, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> Am 07.03.2024 um 19:09 schrieb René Rebe :
>>
>> Hey there,
>>
>> I saw the deprecation of ia64*-*-* scrolling by [1].
>>
>> Which surprised me, as (minor bugs aside) gcc ia64*-*-linux just works for
>> us and
>> we still actively supp
11 matches
Mail list logo
