On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 11:27, Rene Rebe <r...@exactcode.de> wrote: > > This might not be the best timing -short before a major release-, > however, Sam just commented on the bug I filled years ago [1], so here > we go: > > Glibc uses .machine to determine assembler optimizations to use. > However, since reworking the rs6000 .machine output selection in > commit e154242724b084380e3221df7c08fcdbd8460674 22 May 2019, G5 as > well as Cell, and even power4 w/ -maltivec currently resulted in > power7. Mask _ALTIVEC away as the .machine selection already did for > GFX and GPOPT. > > powerpc64-t2-linux-gnu-gcc test.c -S -o - -mcpu=G5 > .file "test.c" > .machine power7 > .abiversion 2 > .section ".text" > .ident "GCC: (GNU) 10.2.0" > .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits > > We ship this in T2/Linux [2] since 2020 and it is tested on G5, Cell > and Power8. > > Signed-of-by: René Rebe <r...@exactcode.de> > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97367 > [2] https://t2sde.org > > --- gcc-11.1.0-RC-20210423/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc.vanilla 2021-04-25 > 22:57:16.964223106 +0200 > +++ gcc-11.1.0-RC-20210423/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc 2021-04-25 > 22:57:27.193223841 +0200 > @@ -5765,7 +5765,7 @@ > HOST_WIDE_INT flags = rs6000_isa_flags; > > /* Disable the flags that should never influence the .machine selection. > */ > - flags &= ~(OPTION_MASK_PPC_GFXOPT | OPTION_MASK_PPC_GPOPT | > OPTION_MASK_ISEL); > + flags &= ~(OPTION_MASK_PPC_GFXOPT | OPTION_MASK_PPC_GPOPT | > OPTION_MASK_ALTIVEC | OPTION_MASK_ISEL); > > if ((flags & (ISA_3_1_MASKS_SERVER & ~ISA_3_0_MASKS_SERVER)) != 0) > return "power10";
Patches should be sent to the gcc-patches list instead of this one, and should be against trunk not an old gcc-11 RC. See https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches for more details - thanks!