On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 19:24:23 +
Richard Nardi via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I hope you are having a wonderful day. I would like to engage your firm to
> prepare my tax return for the current tax year. [...]
Sounds legit. I have a feeling you'll be asking me for my credit card number
and bank
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 03:20:31PM -0400, Olivier Dion wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a request for comments on extending the atomic builtins API to
> help avoiding redundant memory barriers. Indeed, there are
What atomic builtins API are you talking about? The kernel's? That's
what it sounded
Hello,
I hope you are having a wonderful day. I would like to engage your firm to
prepare my tax return for the current tax year. Prior to this year, my wife had
always been in charge of our tax returns. However, our financial situation has
changed, and she has also taken on additional respons
Hi all,
This is a request for comments on extending the atomic builtins API to
help avoiding redundant memory barriers. Indeed, there are
discrepancies between the Linux kernel consistency memory model (LKMM)
and the C11/C++11 memory consistency model [0]. For example,
fully-ordered atomic opera
W dniu 3.07.2023 o 18:57, Richard Earnshaw (lists) pisze:
On 03/07/2023 17:42, Rafał Pietrak via Gcc wrote:
Hi Ian,
[-]
And WiKi reporting up to 40% performance improvements in some corner
cases is impressive and encouraging. I believe, that the reported
average of 5-8% improvement
On 03/07/2023 17:42, Rafał Pietrak via Gcc wrote:
Hi Ian,
W dniu 3.07.2023 o 17:07, Ian Lance Taylor pisze:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:21 PM Rafał Pietrak via Gcc
wrote:
[]
I was thinking about that, and it doesn't look as requiring that deep
rewrites. ABI spec, that could accomodat
Hi Ian,
W dniu 3.07.2023 o 17:07, Ian Lance Taylor pisze:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:21 PM Rafał Pietrak via Gcc wrote:
[]
I was thinking about that, and it doesn't look as requiring that deep
rewrites. ABI spec, that could accomodate the functionality could be as
little as one addit
Hi David,
W dniu 3.07.2023 o 16:52, David Brown pisze:
[]
But, before I dive into learning C++ (forgive the naive question)
isn't it so, that C++ comes with a heavy runtime? One that will bloat
my tiny project? Or the bloat comes only when one uses particular
elaborated class
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:21 PM Rafał Pietrak via Gcc wrote:
>
> W dniu 28.06.2023 o 17:44, Richard Earnshaw (lists) pisze:
> [---]
> > I think I understand what you're asking for but:
> > 1) You'd need a new ABI specification to handle this, probably involving
> > register assignments (f
On 28/06/2023 10:35, Rafał Pietrak via Gcc wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
W dniu 28.06.2023 o 09:31, Jonathan Wakely pisze:
If you use a C++ library type for your pointers the syntax above
doesn't need to change, and the fancy pointer type can be implemented
portable, with customisation for targets w
On 03/07/2023 15:34, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023, 4:33 AM Claudio Eterno
wrote:
Hi Joel, I'll give an answer ASAP on the newlib and libgloss...
I supposed your question were about the licences question on newlib,
instead you were really asking what changed on the repo libs...
I
Dear Friends:
1) I have (of course) kept your copyright notice at the start of the « asm.h »
header file of my project.
2) I have published my source code using your GPL V3 license
I am not trying to steal you anything. And I would insist that I have great
respect for the people working with g
Hi Wil,
Our toolchains installations are relocatable, and therefore can't have an rpath
hardcoded into them. Instead, we provide instructions in the user manual how to
set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to pick up the correct libraries.
If you're creating OS packages then you could probably add the lib64 dire
13 matches
Mail list logo
