在 2020/8/11 下午9:55, Nathan Sidwell 写道:
>
> I agree, it's the way I use auto. I particularly like the
> auto *foo = expr;
> idiom, when you're getting a pointer, but the type of the pointee is clear.
> It informs how you use 'foo'.
>
>
Personally I dislike this syntax. Pointers are objects
This is a kind of esoteric problem, but all the more annoying for that.
As usual I've built my own version of GCC, and then I check it into Git
so that all builds can use this one canonical compiler regardless of
operating system, etc.
After being checked into Git, the compiler started failing to
Note, I'm getting close to getting my part of the structure reorganization
optimization minimally functional (my question about value range propagation
remains open since I re-enabled a couple of optimizations to bypass it.)
Therefore this is actually important for me to resolve.
I obviously gen
Hi,
Would you like to check out the contacts of *SharpSpring *users?
If you are interested please drop me a note so that we can connect and
discuss about the opportunity.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
*Gregorio Gilbert *|Manager Demand Generation|
If you do not wish further mail pleas
For these two dump files:
exe.ltrans0.ltrans.074i.cp
and
exe.ltrans0.ltrans.087i.structure-reorg
doesn't the ".074i." mean that this dump was created
before the ".087i." dump?
If so then why does the ".074i." show GIMPLE that was
created in the structure-reorg pass?
Thanks,
Gary
CONFIDENTI
On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 14:56, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>
> On 8/7/20 10:06 AM, Luis Machado via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > cc-ing the GCC mailing list, as we may want to use the same coding style
> > for GDB and GCC.
> >
> > Yesterday I brought this topic up on IRC. I notice we started using more
> >
On 8/7/20 10:06 AM, Luis Machado via Gcc wrote:
Hi,
cc-ing the GCC mailing list, as we may want to use the same coding style
for GDB and GCC.
Yesterday I brought this topic up on IRC. I notice we started using more
and more the "auto" keyword. In some cases, this is actually useful and
make
Hello again,
Thanks for replying to my previous thread. I am thankful for all input
received and addressed the comments which I could address. I have been
working on the past two weeks on fixing the style and adding comments
explaining classes and families of functions. I have also added a
pr
I noticed there's a couple of links on arm.com that changed recently
(probably in the last month or so).
Can you please help and get those updated? (Even those that redirect.)
On http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/changes.html
https://developer.arm.com/docs/101028/0009/data-processing-intrinsics
