Re: Doubts regarding the _Dependent_ptr keyword

2019-07-23 Thread Akshat Garg
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:41 AM Akshat Garg wrote: > Hi all, > > I have tried to make the dependent_ptr qualification act as volatile > during the RTL passes to bypass the RTL optimizations for now. Here is the > patch > https://github.com/AKG001/gcc/commit/14c05ae546554f822f667fdb72080b7fe52fea3

Re: Doubts regarding the _Dependent_ptr keyword

2019-07-23 Thread Akshat Garg
Hi all, I have tried to make the dependent_ptr qualification act as volatile during the RTL passes to bypass the RTL optimizations for now. Here is the patch https://github.com/AKG001/gcc/commit/14c05ae546554f822f667fdb72080b7fe52fea32 For this (https://github.com/AKG001/test/blob/master/dependenc

Re: [GSoC-19] Implementing narrowing functions like fadd

2019-07-23 Thread Tejas Joshi
Hi all, I have some doubts regarding narrowing functions. Functions like fadd have different variants like fadd, faddl and daddl. These functions differs from general floating point functions which have float and long double argument types. These functions are defined in builtins.def like floor, fl

Re: RFC: Deprecate libstdc++ Policy-Based Data Structures

2019-07-23 Thread Alexander Kulkov
Sounds fair to me. Well, I personally might be interested in providing fixes and improvements for the code. I might even try to find some other people in community to contribute. PBDS is very well-thought library which I admired since the moment I saw it, and the possibility that it may completely

Re: RFC: Deprecate libstdc++ Policy-Based Data Structures

2019-07-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
Sorry for the late reply that wasn't "tomorrow". On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 23:40, Alexander Kulkov wrote: > > Hi there! I hope, this message will go to where it's expected to go, since > I'm not really familiar with e-mail threads. > > I was the one who brought https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

Re: Can LTO minor version be updated in backward compatible way ?

2019-07-23 Thread Jeff Law
On 7/23/19 2:49 AM, Martin Liška wrote: > On 7/22/19 4:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 7/22/19 8:25 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >>> On 7/17/19 8:10 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 7/17/19 11:29 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: > Romain Geissler writes: >> >> I have no idea of the LTO format and if indeed it

Re: Can LTO minor version be updated in backward compatible way ?

2019-07-23 Thread Martin Liška
On 7/22/19 4:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 7/22/19 8:25 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >> On 7/17/19 8:10 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 7/17/19 11:29 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: Romain Geissler writes: > > I have no idea of the LTO format and if indeed it can easily be updated > in a backward compa