Giuliano,
I asked for some documentation off you related to the RTL passes. Not sure
if you are just hitting bottlenecks in all_rtl_passes or ipa_passes functions
but it seems that the SSA trees and cfgloop.c and cfgloop.h files optimization
passes would still be a issue. Particularly after the fi
On 7/1/19 5:00 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is updated version of the zstd patch that should handle all what Joseph
> pointed out.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
>
> 0002-Add-zstd-support-for-
On 7/1/19 4:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Ok, so there's a version with added ChangeLog that survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
>
> 0001-Add-.gnu.lto_.lto-section.patch
>
> From e6745583dc4b7f5543878c0a25498e818531f73e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> F
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:06 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 8:59 PM Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 05:58:48AM +0530, Akshat Garg wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:49 PM Akshat Garg wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:04 PM Ramana Radha
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:40 PM Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:15:55PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:38 PM Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Once a user-created non-dependent pointer is assigned to, it is OK to
> > > break the depend
On 7/2/19 2:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> External Email
>
> --
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:58 PM Gary Oblock wrote:
>> I've been looking at trying to optimize the performance of code for
>> programs that use functions like qsort
On July 2, 2019 5:36:08 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Merrill wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 8:59 PM Paul E. McKenney
>wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 05:58:48AM +0530, Akshat Garg wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:49 PM Akshat Garg
>wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:04 PM Ramana Radha
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 8:59 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 05:58:48AM +0530, Akshat Garg wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:49 PM Akshat Garg wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:04 PM Ramana Radhakrishnan <
> > > ramana@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On T
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:15:55PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:38 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >
> > Once a user-created non-dependent pointer is assigned to, it is OK to
> > break the dependency.
>
> Ok, that's good.
> >
> > Or am I missing the point here?
>
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:38 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Once a user-created non-dependent pointer is assigned to, it is OK to
> break the dependency.
Ok, that's good.
>
> Or am I missing the point here?
I was just trying to make sure we were on the same page. I wonder if
marking this volatil
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:01:00PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> >>
> >> It's worth figuring out what passes are doing this - however the worry
> >> I have is that every pass now needs to be handling this case with
> >> respect to pointer attributes. Is there some place that you are
> >> sto
>>
>> It's worth figuring out what passes are doing this - however the worry
>> I have is that every pass now needs to be handling this case with
>> respect to pointer attributes. Is there some place that you are
>> storing said information and what is the transitive nature of
>> assignments with t
On Tue, 2 Jul, 2019, 3:52 PM Ramana Radhakrishnan, <
ramana@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:29 AM Akshat Garg wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:49 PM Akshat Garg wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:04 PM Ramana Radhakrishnan <
> ramana@googlemail.com> wrot
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:29 AM Akshat Garg wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:49 PM Akshat Garg wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:04 PM Ramana Radhakrishnan
>> wrote:
>>>
>> [CCing gcc mailing list]
>>
>> So, shall I start looking over the pointer optimizations only and see what
>> info
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 02 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:58 PM Gary Oblock wrote:
>>
>> I've been looking at trying to optimize the performance of code for
>> programs that use functions like qsort where a function is passed the
>> name of a function and some constant parameter(
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:58 PM Gary Oblock wrote:
>
> I've been looking at trying to optimize the performance of code for
> programs that use functions like qsort where a function is passed the
> name of a function and some constant parameter(s).
>
> The function qsort itself is an excellent exam
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 08:57, Yann Droneaud wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sometime in need to "probe" the size, the type, (and less often the
> alignment) of a field inside a structure.
>
> In such case I have to write "ugly" thing like
>
> struct A
> {
> struct
> {
> type_t t;
> } B
Hi,
I'm sometime in need to "probe" the size, the type, (and less often the
alignment) of a field inside a structure.
In such case I have to write "ugly" thing like
struct A
{
struct
{
type_t t;
} B;
};
typeof(((struct A *)NULL)->B.t) V;
It would have been some much p
18 matches
Mail list logo
