On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:38 PM Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Once a user-created non-dependent pointer is assigned to, it is OK to > break the dependency. Ok, that's good. > > Or am I missing the point here? I was just trying to make sure we were on the same page. I wonder if marking this volatile would be sufficient for prototyping. I suspect we would need another flag somewhere which someone with gimple knowledge might be able to help us with. regards Ramana > > Thanx, Paul > > > Ramana > > >> > > >> > > >> > Does this sounds like a workable plan for ? Let me know your thoughts. > > >> > If this sounds good then, we can do this for all the optimizations > > >> > that may kill the dependencies at somepoint. > > >> > > > >> > -Akshat > > >
