would you review the srcy programming language?

hi! i'm the dotre, and i am designing a programming language, you may be interested at, it is general purpose, structured, imperative, data-driven and autonomous; i have already its syntax and very brief introduction as documentation. it is documented with google docs, but it can be downloaded wit

Simple GCC projects page

Hello all, If this belongs in a different mailbox, please let me know where it should be sent. I would like to start contributing to GCC. In viewing the relevant pages it became clear that they have not been updated for some time, which makes starting to contribute a bit more challenging.  To n

Re: Internal compiler error building libstdc++ for vax

On 03/19/2018 03:46 PM, co...@sdf.org wrote: > (updating) > krister found a better hack patch which explains what the problem is, > adding a useless move at the end of the instruction, so the label is > not the last instruction. > > (And, in the problem code, the last instruction in the function.)

Re: Internal compiler error building libstdc++ for vax

(updating) krister found a better hack patch which explains what the problem is, adding a useless move at the end of the instruction, so the label is not the last instruction. (And, in the problem code, the last instruction in the function.) --- a/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/gcc/config/vax/builtins.md

Re: GSOC Question about the parallelization project

On March 19, 2018 8:09:32 PM GMT+01:00, Sebastiaan Peters wrote: >>The goal should be to extend TU wise parallelism via make to function >wise parallelism within GCC. > >Could you please elaborate more on this? In the abstract sense you'd view the compilation process separated into N stages, ea

Re: ASAN status and glibc 2.27

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Hi, > > Any news about the ASAN compatibility with glibc 2.27 on x86? > Will this be fixed soon? This is important as this is a blocker. > > FYI, I had reported: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761 Asan runtime librar

Re: GSOC Question about the parallelization project

>The goal should be to extend TU wise parallelism via make to function wise >parallelism within GCC. Could you please elaborate more on this? From: Richard Biener Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 18:37 To: Sebastiaan Peters Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GSOC Quest

Re: GSOC Question about the parallelization project

On March 19, 2018 4:27:58 PM GMT+01:00, Sebastiaan Peters wrote: >Thank you for your quick response. > >Does the GIMPLE optimization pipeline include only the Tree SSA passes >or also the RTL passes? Yes, it only includes only Tree SSA passes. The RTL part of the pipeline hasn't been audited to

Re: www.sgi.com/tech/stl/ is gone

On 18 March 2018 at 23:37, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > ...redirecting to a dummy page. Unfortunately there are a fair > number of references in the libstdc++ docs, see below. > > I'll take care of anything outside of libstdc++; can you please > have a look as far as the libstdc++ docs go? > > Gerald

Re: GSOC Question about the parallelization project

Thank you for your quick response. Does the GIMPLE optimization pipeline include only the Tree SSA passes or also the RTL passes? Are the currently other parts of the compiler that have been parallelized? Kind regards, Sebastiaan Peters

ASAN status and glibc 2.27

Hi, Any news about the ASAN compatibility with glibc 2.27 on x86? Will this be fixed soon? This is important as this is a blocker. FYI, I had reported: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761 -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML -

Re: GSOC Question about the parallelization project

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Sebastiaan Peters wrote: > Hello, > > My name is Sebastiaan Peters, currently an undergrad compsci student from The > Netherlands. > > I'm interested in the project about parallelizing the compilation with > threads project. Thanks for your interest in this proj