Paranoid jails/sandboxes inside a virtual machine may mitigate a lot
the risk for those untrusted binaries, right? Plus using a debugger
and maybe an antivirus (I don't trust them so much and prefer to
isolate them too)?
What about already built software? Can those be "fixed"? What about
GLibC? Wh
Hello.
Excuse me my ignorance, but that's what people say me.
GCC can compile to Microsoft Windows platforms, I understand it. But
people say me it uses a "shim" between *nix and native Microsoft
Windows API.
Some developers said me GCC on Windows is a "toy compiler".
Is this right?
Kind regar
On 04/01/18 16:03, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Jan 04 2018, Sebastian Huber wrote:
/home/sh/src/gcc/gcc/config/nios2/nios2.h:436:31: error: expected '=',
',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'nios2_section_threshold'
extern unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT nios2_section_threshold;
Change the prepro
Thanks Jonathan!
Hm... why would don't add it for portability? Of course, i don't see codes with
Nested-Functions so much, but...
I think that better would delete it, or add full support?
And, it's contradicts to standart of C, nope?:)
~~~
About lambda:
Yeah is very pooowerful, of course
Hi,
I am new to gcc and was trying to implement a gimple pass today. One thing
I tried to do was to make a call_stat that originally calls malloc call
another function like new_malloc. I used gimple_call_set_fndecl and also
did update_stmt (although I don't know exactly what it does). But the fina
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 7:14 PM, Zan Lynx wrote:
>
> On January 4, 2018 8:10:14 PM MST, Eric Gallager wrote:
>>Is there anything GCC could be doing at the compiler level to mitigate
>>the recently-announced Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities? From
>>reading about them, it seems like they involve
On January 4, 2018 8:10:14 PM MST, Eric Gallager wrote:
>Is there anything GCC could be doing at the compiler level to mitigate
>the recently-announced Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities? From
>reading about them, it seems like they involve speculative execution
>and indirect branch prediction,
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
> Is there anything GCC could be doing at the compiler level to mitigate
> the recently-announced Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities? From
> reading about them, it seems like they involve speculative execution
> and indirect branch prediction
Is there anything GCC could be doing at the compiler level to mitigate
the recently-announced Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities? From
reading about them, it seems like they involve speculative execution
and indirect branch prediction, and those are the domain of things the
compiler deals with, r
Snapshot gcc-7-20180104 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20180104/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7
On 15/12/2017 03:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
FAIL: 23_containers/vector/cons/destructible_neg.cc (test for errors, line 35)
FAIL: 23_containers/vector/cons/destructible_neg.cc (test for errors, line 41)
I had a look at this remaining issue. The compilation result is:
In file included from
/h
On Jan 04 2018, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> /home/sh/src/gcc/gcc/config/nios2/nios2.h:436:31: error: expected '=',
> ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'nios2_section_threshold'
> extern unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT nios2_section_threshold;
Change the preprocessor conditional to check USED_FOR_TA
On 01/03/2018 07:52 PM, Austin T wrote:
By nested functions, I'm assuming that means raw function definitions that
are valid inside a temporary scope of a function. If I'm not mistaken,
they're equivalent to C++ lambda expressions but just written in a
syntactic sugar syntax.
GNU-C nested fun
> This HOST_WIDE_INT is defined in gcc/hwint.h. Who is supposed to include
> this file? Is this done via an #include or via a tm_file (gcc/config.gcc)?
Nobody I'd say, the declaration shouldn't be compiled for the target.
--
Eric Botcazou
Hello,
I tried to build an Ada compiler for nios2-rtems5 and ended up with this:
/run/user/10351/b-gcc-nios2/./gcc/xgcc
-B/run/user/10351/b-gcc-nios2/./gcc/ -nostdinc
-B/run/user/10351/b-gcc-nios2/nios2-rtems5/newlib/ -isystem
/run/user/10351/b-gcc-nios2/nios2-rtems5/newlib/targ-include -isys
On 4 January 2018 at 00:54, nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-01-03 07:52 PM, Austin T wrote:
>> By nested functions, I'm assuming that means raw function definitions that
>> are valid inside a temporary scope of a function. If I'm not mistaken,
>> they're equivalent to C++ lambda expressions but just w
On 4 January 2018 at 00:44, nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-01-03 06:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 3 January 2018 at 21:13, Alexsandr Yvarov wrote:
>>> Why would dont add it at GNU G++?
>>
>> Aren't C++ lambda expressions more powerful and flexible?
>>
>
> It depends actually, lambdas are consider
17 matches
Mail list logo
