Re: g++ extension for Concepts TS

2017-04-10 Thread Nathan Ridge
cc Andrew Sutton From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org on behalf of Christopher Di Bella Sent: April 2, 2017 8:57 AM To: gcc Mailing List Subject: g++ extension for Concepts TS Hey all, I've been working on a concept extension that permits type aliases inside the

lvx versus lxvd2x on power8

2017-04-10 Thread Igor Henrique Soares Nunes
Hi all, I recently checked this old discussion about when/why to use lxvd2x instead of lvsl/lvx/vperm/lvx to load elements from memory to vector: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-03/msg00135.html I had the same doubt and I was also concerned how performance influences on these approaches. So th

Re: Release criteria for Darwin

2017-04-10 Thread Mike Stump
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 8:17 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Simon Wright wrote: >> I see that, in the GCC 7 Release Criteria, the Secondary Platforms list >> includes i686-apple-darwin. >> >> Should this now be x86_64-apple-darwin? I've been building this since

Re: Release criteria for Darwin

2017-04-10 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Simon Wright wrote: > I see that, in the GCC 7 Release Criteria, the Secondary Platforms list > includes i686-apple-darwin. > > Should this now be x86_64-apple-darwin? I've been building this since GCC > 4.5.0, Darwin 10, in 2011. If the Darwin maintainers conc

Release criteria for Darwin

2017-04-10 Thread Simon Wright
I see that, in the GCC 7 Release Criteria, the Secondary Platforms list includes i686-apple-darwin. Should this now be x86_64-apple-darwin? I've been building this since GCC 4.5.0, Darwin 10, in 2011.

Re: [RFA] update ggc_min_heapsize_heuristic()

2017-04-10 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2017.04.10 at 13:14 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 10/04/17 12:06, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:52:15PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > >>> --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072 > >>> 11264.89user 311.88system 24:18.69elapsed 793%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata >

Re: [RFA] update ggc_min_heapsize_heuristic()

2017-04-10 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 10/04/17 12:06, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:52:15PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: >>> --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072 >>> 11264.89user 311.88system 24:18.69elapsed 793%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata >>> 1265352maxresident)k >> >> --param ggc-min-heapsize=262144 >> 10778

Re: [RFA] update ggc_min_heapsize_heuristic()

2017-04-10 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:52:15PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072 > > 11264.89user 311.88system 24:18.69elapsed 793%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > > 1265352maxresident)k > > --param ggc-min-heapsize=262144 > 10778.52user 336.34system 23:15.71elapsed 796%CPU (0av

Re: [RFA] update ggc_min_heapsize_heuristic()

2017-04-10 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2017.04.10 at 12:15 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2017.04.10 at 10:56 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > > > What are the numbers with 256M? > > Here are the numbers from a 4core/8thread 16GB RAM Skylake machine. > They look less stellar than the ppc64le ones (variability is s

Re: [RFA] update ggc_min_heapsize_heuristic()

2017-04-10 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2017.04.10 at 10:56 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 09/04/17 21:06, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > On 2017.04.09 at 21:10 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > >> On 2017.04.09 at 21:25 +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote: > >>> On Sun, 9 Apr 2017, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > >>> > Th

Re: [RFA] update ggc_min_heapsize_heuristic()

2017-04-10 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 09/04/17 21:06, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2017.04.09 at 21:10 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: >> On 2017.04.09 at 21:25 +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote: >>> On Sun, 9 Apr 2017, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: >>> The minimum size heuristic for the garbage collector's heap, before it

Re: [RFA] update ggc_min_heapsize_heuristic()

2017-04-10 Thread Trevor Saunders
On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 10:06:21PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2017.04.09 at 21:10 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > On 2017.04.09 at 21:25 +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote: > > > On Sun, 9 Apr 2017, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > > > > > > The minimum size heuristic for the garbage c

Re: Renaming moutline-msabi-xlogues to mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues

2017-04-10 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 03:52:30PM -0500, Daniel Santos wrote: > So I've been browsing through the gcc docs for other archs and > noticed that they all use different terminology for their options that > call or jump to stubs as a substitute for emitting inline saves & > restores for registers. >