On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 15:27 -0700, David Wohlferd wrote:
> Looking at the v6 release criteria
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/criteria.html) there are about a dozen
> supported platforms.
>
> Looking at the Machine Constraints docs
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Machine-Constraints.html), t
On Fri, 6 May 2016, NOC wrote:
> We have changed our mirror server setup.
>
> Could you please update the mirror list and replace:
>
> France, Gravelines: http://mirror0.babylon.network/gcc/ |
> ftp://mirror0.babylon.network/gcc/ |
> rsync://mirror0.babylon.network/gcc/, thanks to Tim Semeijn
> (
Snapshot gcc-7-20160508 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20160508/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
Looking at the v6 release criteria
(https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/criteria.html) there are about a dozen
supported platforms.
Looking at the Machine Constraints docs
(https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Machine-Constraints.html), there are
34 architectures listed. That's a lot of entries to scrol
On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 15:03 -0700, David Wohlferd wrote:
> On 4/28/2016 9:41 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 04/28/2016 01:35 AM, David Wohlferd wrote:
> > > As part of the work I've done on inline asm, I've been looking
> > > thru the
> > > bugs for it. There appear to be a number that have been f
On 4/28/2016 12:23 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:35 AM, David Wohlferd
wrote:
As part of the work I've done on inline asm, I've been looking thru the bugs
for it. There appear to be a number that have been fixed or overtaken by
events over the years, but the bug is still
On 4/28/2016 9:41 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 04/28/2016 01:35 AM, David Wohlferd wrote:
As part of the work I've done on inline asm, I've been looking thru the
bugs for it. There appear to be a number that have been fixed or
overtaken by events over the years, but the bug is still open.
Is clo
On 4/28/2016 2:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 9:35 AM, David Wohlferd wrote:
As part of the work I've done on inline asm, I've been looking thru the bugs
for it. There appear to be a number that have been fixed or overtaken by
events over the years, but the bug is still o
* Rich Felker:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 06:09:54PM +0200, Volodymyr Kuznetsov wrote:
>> We have prototype that supports swapcontext that we're happy to
>> release, but it clearly requires more work before being ready to merge
>> upstream.
>
> The *context APIs are deprecated and I'm not sure they
