On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:20 PM Siva Chandra wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Eric Christopher
>> wrote:
>> > Does the object file without -gsplit-dwarf have multiple sections? If
>> > so,
>> > that should narrow it down
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
> Does the object file without -gsplit-dwarf have multiple sections? If so,
> that should narrow it down for you, otherwise it's really curious.
Without -gsplit-dwarf, there is only one .debug_macro section.
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:33
On 18.12.2015 10:27, David Wohlferd wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 11:30 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:13:07, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
What's your take on making -Wonly-top-basic-asm a default
(either now or
v7)? Is making it a non-default a waste of time because no
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The following tries to address the issue that with delayed folding
> and the general attempt to do folding on GIMPLE we have "unfolded"
> trees up to the point where we go into SSA (as otherwise the
> match-and-simplify machinery on GIMPLE can't get
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Martin Jambor as HSA maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Martin on his new role.
Martin, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
The following tries to address the issue that with delayed folding
and the general attempt to do folding on GIMPLE we have "unfolded"
trees up to the point where we go into SSA (as otherwise the
match-and-simplify machinery on GIMPLE can't get to the defs of uses
to match larger expressions).
The
On 12/17/2015 11:30 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:13:07, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
What's your take on making -Wonly-top-basic-asm a default (either now or
v7)? Is making it a non-default a waste of time because no one will
ever see it? Or is making it a default too aggr
On 12/17/2015 6:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/17/2015 03:39 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 17/12/15 01:41, David Wohlferd wrote:
On the contrary, I would be surprised to learn that there are ANY
compilers (other than clang) that support gcc's extended asm format.
Prepare to be surprised: Sun Studi
