On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Eric Christopher <echri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:20 PM Siva Chandra <sivachan...@google.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Eric Christopher <echri...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Does the object file without -gsplit-dwarf have multiple sections? If >> > so, >> > that should narrow it down for you, otherwise it's really curious. >> >> Without -gsplit-dwarf, there is only one .debug_macro section. >> > > Well, that's fascinating. My guess is something in objcopy is mangling.
I did some digging last week. It seemed to me that each block of macro entries pointed to by a DW_MACRO_transparent_include (when NOT using -gsplit-dwarf) was getting its own .debug_macro section when using -gsplit-dwarf. >> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:33 AM Siva Chandra <sivachan...@google.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> When I compile my cc file with "-g3 -gsplit-dwarf", the resulting .dwo >> >> file has multiple .debug_macro.dwo sections. Is that expected? I did >> >> not find anything in the proposal which explains this: >> >> http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=110722.1 >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Siva Chandra
