Hi All,
I am a beginner of gcc.
My goal of modifying gcc is to maintain two stacks.
One is accessed by rbp, the other is accessed by rsp.
rsp is only used by call/ret. All other accesses (e.g., access parameters,
access local variables)
to stack are via rbp.
For easy implementation, I would
On 01/27/15 14:22, David Edelsohn wrote:
If a new system is procured, we need to perform the transition in a
more timely manner so that the new system is not idle for a year like
last time.
I thought that there was more than one system. Is it possible to
divide the work between multiple systems
Am Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:15:08 -0500
"Frank Ch. Eigler" :
> Hi -
>
> > > thank you, I tried creating an account, but it said: Unknown action
> > > newaccount.
> > Frank, do you know what the problem might be?
>
> Yes, this facility was temporarily disabled, as a load-shedding
> measure. I'll tur
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
>>> quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
>>> I the only one who has
Hi -
> > thank you, I tried creating an account, but it said: Unknown action
> > newaccount.
> Frank, do you know what the problem might be?
Yes, this facility was temporarily disabled, as a load-shedding
measure. I'll turn it back on for a few hours.
- FChE
On 1/27/2015 1:31 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> On January 27, 2015 11:39:13 AM CST, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 09:36 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.o
On January 27, 2015 11:39:13 AM CST, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 09:36 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
>> >> quite slow for me when
On 27 January 2015 at 18:31, Martin Uecker wrote:
>
>
> Manuel López-Ibáñez :
>
>> On 26 January 2015 at 19:15, Martin Uecker wrote:
>> >
>> > Since my patch to change this has been accepted, could you please
>> > update the FAQ again?
>>
>> Done. Moreover, if you create a wiki account, I will gr
Hi,
Am David Edward Cleasby, Group financial director of Bidvest Bank. I will like
discuss an Inheritance deal with you which be of help to both of us, if
interested kindly reply to: davideclea...@gmail.com for more details.
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 09:36 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
> >> quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
> >> I the only one who has exp
Manuel López-Ibáñez :
> On 26 January 2015 at 19:15, Martin Uecker wrote:
> >
> > Since my patch to change this has been accepted, could you please
> > update the FAQ again?
>
> Done. Moreover, if you create a wiki account, I will grant you editing powers.
thank you, I tried creating an accou
On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
I the only one who has experienced it?
I got some timeouts while updating my glibc git repo y
On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
I the only one who has experienced it?
I got some timeouts while updating my glibc git repo y
On January 27, 2015 10:04:51 AM CST, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
>On 27 January 2015 at 16:02, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
>> quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
>> I the only one who has experienced it?
>
>No, everyone sees it. Spamm
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
> quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
> I the only one who has experienced it?
I got some timeouts while updating my glibc git repo yesterday.
I had never run into that b
On 27 January 2015 at 16:02, H.J. Lu wrote:
> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
> quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
> I the only one who has experienced it?
No, everyone sees it. Spammers are trying to write to the wiki or
something and are DOSing the ma
For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
I the only one who has experienced it?
--
H.J.
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:12:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:04:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> > > > > [PATCH] S/390
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:12:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:04:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> > > > [PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
> > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
On 01/27/2015 10:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to apply the following patch:
>>
>> [PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02370.html
>>
>> It is a backend only change to our existing -mh
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:04:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> > > I would like to apply the following patch:
> > >
> > > [PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/ms
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:04:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> > I would like to apply the following patch:
> >
> > [PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02370.html
> >
> > It is a backend only change to our
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to apply the following patch:
>
> [PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02370.html
>
> It is a backend only change to our existing -mhotpatch feature
> requested by the Linux kernel guys fo
Hi,
I would like to apply the following patch:
[PATCH] S/390: -mhotpatch v2
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02370.html
It is a backend only change to our existing -mhotpatch feature
requested by the Linux kernel guys for the ftrace implementation:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/32
24 matches
Mail list logo
