Hello Gerald;
Many thanks for updating the page to remove Sunfreeware and Blastwave.
Is there a reason that you did not add a link to our new service at UNIX
Packages www.unixpackages.com ?
Clearly we would appreciate it if you could include it.
Many thanks
Steve & Colin.
Colin Prior
Unix Pac
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20140710 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20140710/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 7/10/2014 5:14 PM, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Jul 10, 2014, at 3:13 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Franzi Edo. wrote:
>>>
>>> As for the version 4.9.0, on OSX stil remain a problem.
>>> I cannot build an ARM a cross compiler!
>>> Here is the message
> On Jul 10, 2014, at 3:13 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Franzi Edo. wrote:
>>
>> As for the version 4.9.0, on OSX stil remain a problem.
>> I cannot build an ARM a cross compiler!
>> Here is the message (same as for the 4.9.0)
>>
>> ...
>> .../Packages/g
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Franzi Edo. wrote:
>
> As for the version 4.9.0, on OSX stil remain a problem.
> I cannot build an ARM a cross compiler!
> Here is the message (same as for the 4.9.0)
>
> ...
> .../Packages/gcc-4.9.1/gcc/config/arm/neon.md:3486:10917: fatal error:
> bracket
On Jul 9, 2014, at 8:21 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> [CCing nickc, who wrote the mn10300 hook in question]
>
> I'm experimenting with separating out instructions from expressions in
> RTL; see [1] for more info on that.
>
> I noticed that mn10300 has this implementation of a target hook:
> #defi
Hi,
As for the version 4.9.0, on OSX stil remain a problem.
I cannot build an ARM a cross compiler!
Here is the message (same as for the 4.9.0)
...
.../Packages/gcc-4.9.1/gcc/config/arm/neon.md:3486:10917: fatal error:
bracket nesting level exceeded maximum of 256
.../Packages/gcc-4.9.1/gcc/
Hi,
I have attempted to add syntax for symbol to denote multiple operators.
I tried it with few bogus patterns and it appears to work hopefully -:)
eg: (bogus pattern):
(for op in plus minus
(match_and_simplify
(op @0 @1)
(op @0 @0)))
generates following patterns:
(plus @0 @1) ->
On 10 July 2014 11:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>> On 10 July 2014 10:01, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
> On 10 July 201
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Colin Prior wrote:
> Please would you be good enough to update
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html and add www.unixpackages.com
> We as you will see from the Sunfreeware site we have removed the majority of
> our packages including GCC (Solaris 2.5, 2.6 7, 8, and 9) over
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 10 July 2014 10:01, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Iain Buclaw
>>> wrote:
On 10 July 2014 08:26, Richard Biener wrote:
> On July 10, 2014
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 10 July 2014 10:01, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>> On 10 July 2014 08:26, Richard Biener wrote:
On July 10, 2014 8:31:54 AM CEST, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm t
Status
==
GCC 4.9.1-rc1 has been created and announced, the branch is now frozen
for blocking regressions and documentation fixes only and all changes
to the branch require a RM approval.
If all goes well, 4.9.1 will be released in a week.
Quality Data
Priority # Chan
GCC 4.9.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
The first release candidate for GCC 4.9.1 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9.1-RC-20140710
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 212419.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release
On 10 July 2014 10:01, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 10 July 2014 08:26, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On July 10, 2014 8:31:54 AM CEST, Iain Buclaw
>>> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get to the bottom of a bug when using the D front-end
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 10 July 2014 08:26, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On July 10, 2014 8:31:54 AM CEST, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I'm trying to get to the bottom of a bug when using the D front-end
>>>with -flto.
>>>
>>>When compiling anything, it always I
On 10 July 2014 08:26, Richard Biener wrote:
> On July 10, 2014 8:31:54 AM CEST, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm trying to get to the bottom of a bug when using the D front-end
>>with -flto.
>>
>>When compiling anything, it always ICEs at in
>>streamer_get_pickled_tree, at tree-streamer-in.c.
>
Hi,
In gcc 4.7.3 I found a bug in the testsuite script g++.dg/lto/lto.exp when a
target does not support LTO (ENABLE_LTO not defined)
The following lines :
if { ![check_effective_target_lto] } {
return
}
Should be called before :
g++_init
lto_init n
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Tom Christensen wrote:
>> I just noticed that on the page with the list for binary packages for
>> Solaris at
>>https://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
>> the distributions „Blastwave“ and „SunFreeware“ are still listed.
>> Blastwave has closed its doors some month ago an
On July 10, 2014 8:31:54 AM CEST, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to get to the bottom of a bug when using the D front-end
>with -flto.
>
>When compiling anything, it always ICEs at in
>streamer_get_pickled_tree, at tree-streamer-in.c.
>
>The of it appears to be that the LTO frontend seems t
On 10 Jul 2014, at 04:23, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that the following targets are built in config-list.mk with
> --enable-obsolete
> i686-interix3 - doesn't appear to actually require --enable-obsolete
> though, should it be marked as obsolete in config.gcc?
> score-* and p
21 matches
Mail list logo
