RE: Joseph Myers joins GCC Steering Committee

Welcome Joseph. Wish everyone Happy Holidays and a wonderful 2014! Charlie -Original Message- From: gcc-announce-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-announce-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of David Edelsohn Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 3:28 AM To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-annou...@gcc.gnu.org S

[buildrobot] s390x-linux broken

On Mon, 2013-12-09 08:21:43 +1300, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > On 9/12/2013, at 3:24 am, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > One of your recent libc<->android clean-up patches broke the > > mips64-linux target as a side-effect, see eg. > > http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=53806

gcc-4.9-20131208 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.9-20131208 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20131208/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: 3 libstdc++ tests fail at random

On 7 December 2013 17:28, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:26 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc execution test >>> >>> async.exe: >>> /usr/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/async/async.cc:66: void >

Re: bisonc++ ??

On 12/08/13 07:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote: It usually means you don't have bison and/or flex installed. Flex. They are documented as prerequisites for building from svn. Documented prerequisites may as well be documented: in the cellar...in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in

Joseph Myers joins GCC Steering Committee

On behalf of the entire GCC Steering Committee, it gives me great pleasure to welcome Joseph Myers as the newest member of the GCC Steering Committee. We hope that everyone will join us to wish him all of the support and wisdom for this new challenge. We are grateful for the contin

Re: [buildrobot] mips64-linux broken

On 9/12/2013, at 3:24 am, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Hi Maxim! > > One of your recent libc<->android clean-up patches broke the > mips64-linux target as a side-effect, see eg. > http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=53806: > > g++ -c -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND

Re: Truncate optimisation question

Eric Botcazou writes: > Therefore, I think that the best thing to do is to go back to Uros' original > idea of distributing the SUBREG only within a PLUS or a MINUS: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01682.html > The outer operation sort of guarantees that operating in this mode is

Re: Truncate optimisation question

> No, the second follow-up was about moving the simplification to combine.c > and guarding it with !WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS, or whatever other check > you prefer, so that no undoing is necessary. In fact the mere distribution of the SUBREG seems to be questionable, whatever the target. For the

Re: bisonc++ ??

On Dec 7, 2013 9:58 PM, "Bruce Korb" wrote: > > On 12/07/13 12:59, Bruce Korb wrote: >> >> Googling: >> >>> gcc undefined reference to `lexer_line' >> >> >> yields: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4262531/trouble-building-gcc-4-6 >> >> Please check for it in configure and mention it in the

Re: 3 libstdc++ tests fail at random

I'll look into the async failure when I get home in a few hours.

[buildrobot] mips64-linux broken

Hi Maxim! One of your recent libc<->android clean-up patches broke the mips64-linux target as a side-effect, see eg. http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=53806: g++ -c -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fn