Hi, Vladimir
I write the new patch as your suggestion.
Could you help me to check is there something missing ?
Thanks, Shiva
gcc/lra-assigns.c | 12 +++-
gcc/lra-constraints.c |5 ++---
gcc/lra-eliminations.c | 10 --
gcc/lra-int.h | 33 +
Dear Sir By using this formula we can reduce the decision algorithm
or logical test to single mathematical equation or algebraic
manipulation. This converts logical operation to arithmetic operation.
In otherwords it is a simple algorithm without decision trees.
Therefore we can make elegant prog
Dear Sir By using this formula we can reduce the decision algorithm
or logical test to single mathematical equation or algebraic
manipulation. This converts logical operation to arithmetic operation.
In otherwords it is a simple algorithm without decision trees.
Therefore we can make elegant pro
Hi there, I'm a student interested in GCC and want to make a proposal
of completing regex in libstdc++.
I've read include/bits/regex.h. As far as I can see, the
implementation of regex_traits is partial because C++11(N3290)
requires two specializations : regex_traits and
regex_triats (28.3.5), whi
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 21 April 2013 18:05, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jonathan Wakely ha scritto:
>>
>>>I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
>>>at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
>>>
>>>
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Paolo Carlini
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jonathan Wakely ha scritto:
>
>>I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
>>at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
>>
>>Will there be a macro like _GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX1Y__ to c
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
> at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
>
> Will there be a macro like _GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX1Y__ to correspond to
> -std=c++1y?
>
> Alternativ
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20130421 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20130421/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On 04/19/2013 03:53 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/17/2013 03:52 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
First of all: What is still important to handle?
It's clear that the expectations in reorg.c are "anything goes" but
modern RISCs (everything since th
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely ha scritto:
>We did, but at the time I was under the incorrect belief that C++14
>would be a TC like C++03. Dietmar and Alisdair both corrected me by
>pointing out it's going to be a new International Standard, not just a
>"bugfix" update to C++11.
Looks like you already ha
On 21 April 2013 18:05, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jonathan Wakely ha scritto:
>
>>I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
>>at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
>>
>>Will there be a macro like _GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX1Y__ to correspond t
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely ha scritto:
>I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
>at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
>
>Will there be a macro like _GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX1Y__ to correspond to
>-std=c++1y?
Humm, I'm still traveling (and a bit ti
I'm starting to implement some new library features voted into C++14
at the Bristol meeting and am wondering what feature check to use.
Will there be a macro like _GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX1Y__ to correspond to
-std=c++1y?
Alternatively we could set the value of __cplusplus to 201400L but I'm
not sure
Hi Eric, Hi Richard,
The mips64vr-elf target currently fails to build in FSF mainline
because:
libgcc/unwind-dw2.c:1159:1: internal compiler error: in output_555, at
config/mips/mips.md:6024
which is here:
(define_insn "casesi_internal_mips16_"
[(set (pc)
(if_then_else
14 matches
Mail list logo