The Go language is closing in what we are calling Go version 1. This
will be a long-term stable release of Go, with no language or library
API changes. Go 1 is described here:
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/pub?id=1ny8uI-_BHrDCZv_zNBSthNKAMX_fR_0dc6epA6lztRE
The expected completi
On 01/10/2012 05:39 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Also outstanding is that the return value setup for beginTransaction
needs to be adjusted into the new block. I.e. we current generate
(set (reg eax) (call _ITM_beginTransaction))
(set (reg psuedo) (reg eax))
.Lrestart:
// rest of tm
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20120110 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20120110/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 01/11/2012 09:29 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> + /* ??? mark only the first call, is it right? */
> + for (insn = get_last_insn ();
> +insn && !CALL_P (insn);
> insn = next_real_insn (insn))
> continue;
FYI, there shall only be one call, surely.
Hmm. I suppose
On 01/09/2012 04:19 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
was
gcc-python-plugin is a plugin for GCC 4.6 onwards which embeds the
CPython interpreter within GCC, allowing you to write new compiler
warnings in Python, generate code visualizations, etc.
It ships with "gcc-with-cpychecker", which implements static analysis
passes for GCC aimed at finding bugs in
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 12:20 -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > Do we really need or want to create shuffle copies for insns that do not
> > have a two operand constraint?
> Yes, I think so. As I remember I did some benchmarking and it gave some
> "order" in hard register assignments and improved
On 01/09/12 04:20, Torvald Riegel wrote:
Looking at Patrick's old list, the following bugs are still open
[trans-mem] save/restore of thread-local data in nested txns is missing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49581
Aldy, you wanted to take a look. Were you able to repr
On 01/07/2012 12:24 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
Hi Vlad,
While debugging a slightly modified version of the test case in PR16458:
int
foo (unsigned int a, unsigned int b)
{
if (a == b) return 1;
if (a> b) return 2;
if (a< b) return 3;
if (a != b) return 4;
ret
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:12:50AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>>
>> > I am fighting against makefile issues on the GCC MELT branch.
>> >
>> > Much more details are given in
>> >http://stackoverflow.com/q/8727896/841108
>> >
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:12:50AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>
> > I am fighting against makefile issues on the GCC MELT branch.
> >
> > Much more details are given in
> >http://stackoverflow.com/q/8727896/841108
> > and in
> >http://lists.gnu.org/arc
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> I am fighting against makefile issues on the GCC MELT branch.
>
> Much more details are given in
>http://stackoverflow.com/q/8727896/841108
> and in
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-make/2012-01/msg00017.html
>
> So (unless you ask) I won't repeat t
Hello All
I am fighting against makefile issues on the GCC MELT branch.
Much more details are given in
http://stackoverflow.com/q/8727896/841108
and in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-make/2012-01/msg00017.html
So (unless you ask) I won't repeat them here.
(and the bugs affec
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:33:54PM -0500, Aayush Upadhyay wrote:
> I'm a sophomore in college, and I'm a solid C programmer. I'd like to work
> on an open source project, and the gcc compiler seems like a great one.
In addition to the other replies, you could also contribute to branches or
to GCC
This mailing list is for development of gcc, not help using it.
Please direct questions about using or building gcc to the gcc-help
list, thanks.
On 10 January 2012 00:54, John Harper wrote:
> My little test program then compiled but wouldn't run even though the
> library said to be missing does
15 matches
Mail list logo
