comes up every few years
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-help/2011-08/msg00073.html
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
With top of tree, I'm seeing
% ../gcc4x/configure --prefix=$HOME/work --enable-languages=c,fortran \
--disable-libmudflap --disable-bootstrap
% gmake
libtool: compile: g++ -B/usr/home/kargl/work/i386-unknown-freebsd10.0/bin/
-B/usr/home/kargl/work/i386-unknown-freebsd10.0/lib/ -isystem
/usr/hom
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
Complicated title, here's a bit of code:
#ifdef FIX
# define PARM2 , class T5
#else
# define PARMS2
#endif
template
struct cl1 {
};
template class T4 = cl1>
struct cl2 {
};
cl2<> var;
If compiled without FIX
santi writes:
> I recently updated my Ubuntu 10.10 to 11.10 and since then I have been
> having problems with my compiler. I have seen that this new Ubuntu
> distribution uses gcc 4.6 whilest my old 10.10 used gcc 4.4.5 or
> 4.4.6.
>
> The main problem I have nowadays is with the math.h library w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/11 11:35, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> Yes.
>
> Thanks!
>
> /me wishes all his reviews went this quickly... ;-)
BTW, I forwarded the request to the committee...
Jeff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using G
> Yes.
Thanks!
/me wishes all his reviews went this quickly... ;-)
Yes.
On 11/09/2011 12:26 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I would like to propose myself as the RL78 GCC port maintainer. The
RL78 GCC port is currently being reviewed, and the corresponding
binutils port has been accepted. In addition to being the primary
author of this port, I also have RL78 hardware t
I would like to propose myself as the RL78 GCC port maintainer. The
RL78 GCC port is currently being reviewed, and the corresponding
binutils port has been accepted. In addition to being the primary
author of this port, I also have RL78 hardware to test against and an
extensive history with Rene
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> during the last minute, patches submitted during stage1
> may be still accepted, if they don't need significant rewrites,
> but please try to get them in soon. Otherwise only bugfixes
> and documentation fixes are allowed for the trunk.
To be clear sinc
On 11/9/2011 12:28 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
I've run into a bootstrapping issue which I'd like to solve
"the right way", instead of continuing to hack around it.
Briefly: I can't build glibc without libgcc_eh.a, which is
provided by gcc. However, libgcc_eh.a is not built, unless
I configure gcc
Hi Joeseph,
On 9 November 2011 11:39, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
>> I've run into a bootstrapping issue which I'd like to solve
>> "the right way", instead of continuing to hack around it.
>>
>> Briefly: I can't build glibc without libgcc_eh.a, which is
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> I've run into a bootstrapping issue which I'd like to solve
> "the right way", instead of continuing to hack around it.
>
> Briefly: I can't build glibc without libgcc_eh.a, which is
> provided by gcc. However, libgcc_eh.a is not built, unless
> I config
Hi everyone,
I recently updated my Ubuntu 10.10 to 11.10 and since then I have been
having problems with my compiler. I have seen that this new Ubuntu
distribution uses gcc 4.6 whilest my old 10.10 used gcc 4.4.5 or 4.4.6.
The main problem I have nowadays is with the math.h library when I nee
I've run into a bootstrapping issue which I'd like to solve
"the right way", instead of continuing to hack around it.
Briefly: I can't build glibc without libgcc_eh.a, which is
provided by gcc. However, libgcc_eh.a is not built, unless
I configure gcc with --enable-shared. But doing so causes
gcc
Hi Jonathan.
I test your patch on OpenBSD-5.0 and mingw. Everywhere works correctly.
Regards, niXman.
The merge breaks bootstrap in 3 different ways (at least) on x86_64-darwin11:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51031
FX
David Brown writes:
> If the compiler can generate fractional arithmetic code directly
> from such expressions, then it is indeed a good step towards
> implementing such types as a pure C++ class without needing to use
> compiler extensions.
...
> I am not saying the compiler couldn't generate opt
17 matches
Mail list logo