On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > during the last minute, patches submitted during stage1 > may be still accepted, if they don't need significant rewrites, > but please try to get them in soon. Otherwise only bugfixes > and documentation fixes are allowed for the trunk.
To be clear since we have several new ports out there: new ports are generally low-risk if they don't require significant changes to target-independent code beyond the standard bits such as config.gcc that are listed in doc/sourcebuild.texi, and can often go in even in stage 4. I believe we currently have at least the CR16, Tile and RL78 ports pending, plus the resurrection of the Interix OS port. I believe all four (or five, since Tile is really two ports) of those ports currently need the people submitting them to send new versions against current trunk that address the most recent review comments - and to be pinged as needed until reviewed. (Take care to ensure they are updated for all the libgcc build system changes that have gone in recently.) If maintainers haven't been explicitly proposed to the SC for these ports, they should be (although a port may sometimes go in without a maintainer being approved - I think the SC are still considering Epiphany maintainership - and depending on the author's GCC experience they may not always be approved as a maintainer initially until they have a reasonable record of good patches). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
