Re: new triplet for x32 psABI?

2011-10-11 Thread Michael LIAO
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 11 October 2011 22:55:35 Michael LIAO wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > On Monday, October 03, 2011 18:25:46 Michael LIAO wrote: >> >> The current scheme documented on website >> >> (https://sit

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-10-11)

2011-10-11 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Website updated as follows. Gerald Index: index.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.813 diff -u -r1.813 index.html --- index.html 12 Sep 2011 00:04:45 - 1.813 +++ index.html 12 Oct

Re: new triplet for x32 psABI?

2011-10-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 22:55:35 Michael LIAO wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday, October 03, 2011 18:25:46 Michael LIAO wrote: > >> The current scheme documented on website > >> (https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/) uses the existing triplet but > >>

Re: The AST tree modification. Edited.

2011-10-11 Thread niXman
Hello! I have figured out the creation of functions and structures, thanks Andi's and Balaji's. Couldn't understand how to create tree for template functions, classes, methods. Can you help me figure that out, please? Thanks.

Re: new triplet for x32 psABI?

2011-10-11 Thread Michael LIAO
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday, October 03, 2011 18:25:46 Michael LIAO wrote: >> As x32 psABI (https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/) is invented, do >> we need a new triplet for system relies on triplet to figure out it's >> targeted on x32 environment. The new

Question about Offsets

2011-10-11 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, This question is regarding adding offsets into a user-defined section into gcc. Let’s say I have a section called “my_section” and I want the section to have some sub-sections (e.g. a string table). One of the fields in my section is the offset to the next header. How do

gcc-4.4-20111011 is now available

2011-10-11 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20111011 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20111011/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-10-11)

2011-10-11 Thread Joseph S. Myers
Status == Trunk remains in Stage 1 and based on the 4.6 release schedule this should end around the end of October unless a small delay is useful to help merge any development branches. Of the branches mentioned in the last status report, it appears that only transactional-memory and cxx-mem-

Re: make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice?

2011-10-11 Thread Paolo Carlini
Yes, this is what I intended. A normal 'make check' will only run the C++ testsuite once, but 'make check-c++' will also run the testsuite in C++0x mode. Ok, thanks. Indeed I remember when you cleaned up some testcases vs c++0x but after a while I noticed something "inconsistent" between make

Re: make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice?

2011-10-11 Thread Jason Merrill
On 10/11/2011 10:03 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: On 10/11/2011 03:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/11/2011 06:51 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: sorry if I just need more sleep, but I'm pretty sure to have seen 'make check-c++' running the C++ testsuite *twice*. Yes. Once with -std=c++0x, once without.

Re: make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice?

2011-10-11 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 10/11/2011 03:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 10/11/2011 06:51 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: sorry if I just need more sleep, but I'm pretty sure to have seen 'make check-c++' running the C++ testsuite *twice*. Yes. Once with -std=c++0x, once without. Doh! But that doesn't happen as part of 'ma

Re: make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice?

2011-10-11 Thread Jason Merrill
On 10/11/2011 06:51 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: sorry if I just need more sleep, but I'm pretty sure to have seen 'make check-c++' running the C++ testsuite *twice*. Yes. Once with -std=c++0x, once without. Jason

Re: make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice?

2011-10-11 Thread Andrew Haley
On 10/11/2011 11:51 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > sorry if I just need more sleep, but I'm pretty sure to have seen 'make > check-c++' running the C++ testsuite *twice*. Seriously, many times over > the last month or two, never before. Does this make sense to anybody? > What could I do to debug it

Re: Merging gdc (GNU D Compiler) into gcc

2011-10-11 Thread Dave Korn
On 05/10/2011 04:56, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 5 October 2011 00:10, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> Iain Buclaw writes: >> >>> First question that pops up after having a quick look is, are there >>> any tips around for writing the scripts for the testsuite? I'm not too >>> familiar with Dejagnu, and t

make check-c++ runs the C++ testsuite twice?

2011-10-11 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, sorry if I just need more sleep, but I'm pretty sure to have seen 'make check-c++' running the C++ testsuite *twice*. Seriously, many times over the last month or two, never before. Does this make sense to anybody? What could I do to debug it? Thanks, Paolo.

Re: added_clobbers_hard_reg_p and FLAGS_REGNUM

2011-10-11 Thread Richard Sandiford
"Paulo J. Matos" writes: > On 26/09/11 17:23, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> >> The function added_clobbers_hard_reg_p is a generated function. So >> another approach would be some sort of attribute which directs the >> generator (genemit) to ignore certain hard registers. >> > > This definitely soun