Re: Bootstrap with -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++

2011-08-21 Thread Joe Buck
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 07:20:41AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Hmmm, you're right, -Wmissing-declarations seems to be equivalent to > -Wmissing-prototypes when using C++. Sorry I missed that. Then it would seem that HJ's issue could be fixed by treating -Wmissing-prototypes as a synonym for

Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h

2011-08-21 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Joern Rennecke wrote: But readers will focus on the word "Issue" here and think that there is something missing. Perhaps there should be a footnote explaining that glibc/eglibc has the needed support, but that other libraries might not. >>> I agree. It should sa

Trunk LTO Bootstrap of Sun Aug 21 18:01:01 UTC 2011 (revision 177942) FAILED

2011-08-21 Thread Toon Moene
See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-08/msg02361.html The configure line is: ../gcc/configure \ --prefix=/tmp/lto \ --enable-languages=c++ \ --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto \ --with-gnu-ld \ --d

Re: Just what are rtx costs?

2011-08-21 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Richard Sandiford schrieb: Georg-Johann Lay writes: Richard Sandiford schrieb: I've been working on some patches to make insn_rtx_cost take account of the cost of SET_DESTs as well as SET_SRCs. But I'm slowly beginning to realise that I don't understand what rtx costs are supposed to repres

Re: [named address] ice-on-valid: in postreload.c:reload_cse_simplify_operands

2011-08-21 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Ulrich Weigand schrieb: Georg-Johann Lay wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-08/msg00131.html Are you going to install that patch? Or maybe you already installed it? No, it isn't approved yet (in fact, it isn't even posted for approval). Usually, patches that add new target macros, or new

Re: Critical behavioral change between g++-4.4/g++-4.5 and g++-4.6 ?

2011-08-21 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi, On 08/21/2011 12:48 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: Wrong mailing list, you are looking for gcc-help. Ok, sorry for that. But, I looked thoroughly to the kyua code and I didn't see anything wrong (even if I might have missed something, I admit it. I'm not a C++ god). In fact, after a quick loo

Re: Critical behavioral change between g++-4.4/g++-4.5 and g++-4.6 ?

2011-08-21 Thread Marc Glisse
Wrong mailing list, you are looking for gcc-help. On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: I was trying to compile a project called kyua with g++-4.6 and I did hit a linking error. It seems that a method was missing. After some discussions with the main developer of the project, it appeare

Critical behavioral change between g++-4.4/g++-4.5 and g++-4.6 ?

2011-08-21 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi, I was trying to compile a project called kyua with g++-4.6 and I did hit a linking error. It seems that a method was missing. After some discussions with the main developer of the project, it appeared that depending on the version of g++ we were using the build was going nicely (g++-4.4/