Re: libiberty/.gitignore isn't in gcc tree

2011-01-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:44:58 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday, January 04, 2011 13:03:59 H.J. Lu wrote: > > libiberty/.gitignore was added to src. But it isn't in gcc tree. > > i dont have access to the gcc tree, so i can only post patches. if someone > were to grant me access, i obv

Re: code is not clean. libjava/interpret.cc:1480

2011-01-17 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
majia gm writes: > libjava/interpret.cc:1480 > > gcc 4.4.0, 4.4.2 and 4.5.2 have the same problem. What precisely are you trying to say? If you are trying to say that this code will not compile if DIRECT_THREADED is not defined, then I agree. It appears to have been broken by this patch, which

Re: bracing errors in gcc/except.c?

2011-01-17 Thread Dave Korn
On 16/01/2011 18:49, Jack Howarth wrote: > The unnecessary bracing immediately after... > > for (lp = i->landing_pads; lp ; lp = lp->next_lp); > > seems odd (as if the line above has accidentally gotten a ';' added). > Is there a coding error here? Clearly, since it would make n

Re: gcc 4.6 release date

2011-01-17 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Pawel Sikora wrote: > On Monday 17 of January 2011 16:32:32 Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> 2011/1/17 Pawel Sikora : >> > >> > will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account? >> > i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x features in my co

Re: gcc 4.6 release date

2011-01-17 Thread Pawel Sikora
On Monday 17 of January 2011 16:32:32 Jonathan Wakely wrote: > 2011/1/17 Pawel Sikora : > > > > will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account? > > i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x features in my code base > > with 4.5 and would be nice to have 4.6 with the

Re: gcc 4.6 release date

2011-01-17 Thread Jonathan Wakely
2011/1/17 Pawel Sikora : > > will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account? > i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x features in my code base > with 4.5 and would be nice to have 4.6 with the same c++0x subset working. You can look at the priority field in bugzi

Re: gcc 4.6 release date

2011-01-17 Thread Pawel Sikora
On Monday 17 of January 2011 11:49:04 Richard Guenther wrote: > 2011/1/16 Mehmet Sinan Şahin : > > Hi, > > > > When do you plan to release gcc 4.6? > > When it's ready. will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account? i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x featur

Re: gcc 4.6 release date

2011-01-17 Thread Richard Guenther
2011/1/16 Mehmet Sinan Şahin : > Hi, > > When do you plan to release gcc 4.6? When it's ready. Richard.