Re: build issue

2010-11-06 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 6 November 2010 21:47, François Dumont wrote: > Hi > >    My latest build finally succeeded, I have simply removed everything > reported by 'svn status' as unknown and done a re-configuration and build. That would imply you're building in the source directory - don't do that. It is strongly ad

gcc-4.6-20101106 is now available

2010-11-06 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20101106 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20101106/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend

2010-11-06 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > "Joseph S. Myers" writes: > > > I think new front ends should be reviewed for general style, coding > > conventions, use of deprecated interfaces, unportabilities etc., just as > > new back ends should be reviewed. > > Would anybody care to volunt

Re: build issue

2010-11-06 Thread François Dumont
Hi My latest build finally succeeded, I have simply removed everything reported by 'svn status' as unknown and done a re-configuration and build. Thanks for your help and sorry for the noise. François On 11/05/2010 01:09 AM, Dave Korn wrote: On 04/11/2010 23:27, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Re: build issue

2010-11-06 Thread François Dumont
Thanks for your help. I just try to clean all I could in the gcc folder but I still have the same problem. Here is the way I configure with the result: [...@localhost gcc]$ ./configure --prefix=/home/fdt --with-mpc=/home/fdt --with-mpfr=/home/fdt --with-gmp=/home/fdt --enable-languages=c++ c

Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend

2010-11-06 Thread Eric Botcazou
> 2010-10-28 Ian Lance Taylor > > * lto-objfile.c: New file. > * lto-elf.c: Remove file. This has removed the support for compatible architectures present in lto-elf.c and hasn't added any replacement in libiberty, so a bunch of LTO tests fail again on 32-bit SPARC/Solaris. The o

Re: Changing PR to ASSIGNED doesn't assign to me automatically

2010-11-06 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 5 November 2010 19:54, Rainer Orth wrote: > I've noticed an annoying change of behaviour in current Bugzilla > compared to the old installation.  If I changed a PR to ASSIGNED, it was > automatically assigned to me.  Now, the state does change to ASSIGNED > alright, but the PR still remains assi

Cheers...

2010-11-06 Thread jkgarrett1
http://bit.ly/aagDPH