FYI, in case anyone else runs into this and comes here looking for
information: a fix is on the way for the "multiple definitions of various
include-path-related things" problem currently breaking bootstrap on Cygwin.
Hope to have it working again within the next few hours.
cheers,
D
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> This is just a friendly letter. There probably will not be another GCC
>> update from the Sunfreeware site ( which is still showing 3.4.6 ) for a
>> long time now that Oracle has pulled finances
On 10/6/2010 6:54 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Oct 6, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
On 10/6/2010 5:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Phung Nguyen wrote:
How can I turn this optimization off?
Use -fno-builtin-printf.
I'm curious, it's obviously a corre
On Oct 6, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
> On 10/6/2010 5:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Phung Nguyen wrote:
>>> How can I turn this optimization off?
>>
>> Use -fno-builtin-printf.
>
> I'm curious, it's obviously a correct optimization, so why
> woul
On 10/6/2010 5:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Phung Nguyen wrote:
How can I turn this optimization off?
Use -fno-builtin-printf.
I'm curious, it's obviously a correct optimization, so why
would you want to turn if off?
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Phung Nguyen wrote:
> How can I turn this optimization off?
Use -fno-builtin-printf.
Richard.
> Phung
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +0700, Phung Nguyen wrote:
>>> When porting GCC on xc16x, I met
How can I turn this optimization off?
Phung
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +0700, Phung Nguyen wrote:
>> When porting GCC on xc16x, I met a problem with a constant string. The
>> following is the C code:
>> #include "stdio.h"
>>
>> int
On Oct 6, 2010, at 6:52 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
>
>> I really wish mrelocatable is added to all archs. The normal ELF relocs
>> are too big to fit well in u-boot.
>
> Every architecture is different and requires a thoughtful approach to
> determine the best way t
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +0700, Phung Nguyen wrote:
> When porting GCC on xc16x, I met a problem with a constant string. The
> following is the C code:
> #include "stdio.h"
>
> int main () {
>
> printf ("c\n");
> }
> And the following is the generated assembly:
> .xc16
Dear all,
When porting GCC on xc16x, I met a problem with a constant string. The
following is the C code:
#include "stdio.h"
int main () {
printf ("c\n");
}
And the following is the generated assembly:
.xc16x
.section .rodata
.LC0:
.ascii "c\0"
.
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> I really wish mrelocatable is added to all archs. The normal ELF relocs
> are too big to fit well in u-boot.
Every architecture is different and requires a thoughtful approach to
determine the best way to handle these issues for that architecture.
Also, since every ar
Gabriel Paubert wrote on 2010/10/06 10:15:26:
>
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:55:36PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Richard Henderson wrote on 2010/10/05 20:56:55:
> > >
> > > On 10/05/2010 06:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/10/05 15:47:38:
> > > >> Joak
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:55:36PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Richard Henderson wrote on 2010/10/05 20:56:55:
> >
> > On 10/05/2010 06:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/10/05 15:47:38:
> > >> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> > >>> While doing relocation work on
Alan Modra wrote on 2010/10/06 00:19:26:
>
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:40:11PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > yes, but this could be a new PIC mode that uses a new better
> > PIC mode for everything. Especially one that doesn't require each function
> > to calculate the GOT address in the fun
14 matches
Mail list logo
