I have it seemingly working now, much better, thanks for the nudges -- that
indeed high id is invalid, and to look again at my GTY use.
I don't know if it made the difference but I changed some whitespace to match
others, and
typedef struct foo_t { ... } foo_t;
to
typedef struct foo { ... } foo_
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20100912 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20100912/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
I'm not up on the details here. But I want to point out that C++0x and C1x
require atomic operations on all platforms, with the expectation that they will
be emulated (most likely with an address-indexed table of locks) on platforms
that don't provide them. If I understand this correctly, it s
http://mirrorpool.in/ mirroring gcc at http://mirrorpool.in/Gcc/.
The mirror will be updated daily and is available to the public. The
maintainer can be reached at top...@gmail.com.
It`s located in Chicago, UNITED STATES.
On 11/09/10 21:21, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> The test tells us whether the back-end has atomic builtins. If it doesn't
>> then we generate calls to the libgcj back end. I really don't want gcj
>> to generate calls to nonexistent __compare_and_swap_4 o
On 11/09/10 20:28, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 09/10/2010 11:50 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>
>>> There is just one front-end file left that still has to #undef
>>> IN_GCC_FRONTEND, allowing the front end to include RTL headers. The
>>> one r
Jack Howarth writes:
> [...]
>Alternatively, perhaps Apple could clarify their own license file to
> clearly indicate that they do not prohibit their GPLv2 code from being
> relicensed as GPLv3-only code. After all, this doesn't really change
> the licensing status of Apple's changes in thei
Hello All,
Do you know about GCC plugins not listed in the wiki page
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/plugins
In general, who is working on some GCC plugins?
I would imagine that there are some other plugins somewhere. I won't be
surprised if Google had some internal, proprietary, GCC plugin (but I
don't
* Florian Weimer:
> Can you look at the generated s-soscons.ads file? I suspect that the
> default
>
> #ifndef MSG_WAITALL
> # define MSG_WAITALL -1
> #endif
> CND(MSG_WAITALL, "Wait for full reception")
>
> kicks in and sets MSG_WAITALL to -1.
>
> Debian's mingw hasn't got the MSG_WAITALL #defin
* koala:
> When trying to build gnat from this snapshot, i had an issue at line
> 280 from gcc/ada/g-socthi-mingw.adb due to:
>
> g-socthi.adb:280:45 value not in range of type "Interfaces.C.unsigned"
> g-socthi.adb:280:45 static expression fails Constraint-check
> Is it all an known issue ?
>
> T
10 matches
Mail list logo
