On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:19:06 +0800 (CST)
"Thinker K.F. Li" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am try to make a plugin to analyze GIMPLE before genericize. It
> will insert some code defined by user into the tree. I want the user
> to specify the inserted code in C. For example,
>
> -
* Richard Kenner wrote on Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:17:47AM CEST:
> > > It's my understanding that FSF legal department has consistently refused
> > > to answer such questions as this.
> >
> > Do you have a quote for that, please?
>
> How do you quote somebody who DOESN'T answer?
I've asked for yo
On 11/09/2010 23:17, Richard Kenner wrote:
>>> It's my understanding that FSF legal department has consistently refused
>>> to answer such questions as this.
>> Do you have a quote for that, please?
>
> How do you quote somebody who DOESN'T answer?
By using a null string, of course!
cheers
> In theory, this is true, but a lot of the optimizations decrease
> accuracy at a cost of making the problem solvable in a reasonable
> amount of time.
> By performing it after building initial points-to sets, the amount of
> accuracy loss is incredibly small.
> The only type of constraint that wi
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Amker.Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am studying gcc's points-to analysis right now and encountered a question.
>> In paper "Off-line Variable Substitution for Scaling Points-to
>> Analysis", section 3.2
>> It says
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 06:17:47PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> > > It's my understanding that FSF legal department has consistently refused
> > > to answer such questions as this.
> >
> > Do you have a quote for that, please?
>
> How do you quote somebody who DOESN'T answer?
>
> The FSF has c
Hi,
I am try to make a plugin to analyze GIMPLE before genericize. It
will insert some code defined by user into the tree. I want the user
to specify the inserted code in C. For example,
--
{
static int i=0;
printf("Hello %d\n",
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20100911 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20100911/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
> > It's my understanding that FSF legal department has consistently refused
> > to answer such questions as this.
>
> Do you have a quote for that, please?
How do you quote somebody who DOESN'T answer?
The FSF has consistently refused to answer questions of the form "if I did
XYZ, would it viol
* Richard Kenner wrote on Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:01:56PM CEST:
> > Please ask the FSF legal dept. to clarify the situation once and for
> > all, they should be able to provide you with a binding (as for GCC)
> > answer within a short time frame.
>
> It's my understanding that FSF legal departme
> Please ask the FSF legal dept. to clarify the situation once and for
> all, they should be able to provide you with a binding (as for GCC)
> answer within a short time frame.
It's my understanding that FSF legal department has consistently refused
to answer such questions as this.
Fice of cook, the duties of which he was
far better able to perform than any of the English. The French
lieutenant seemed the most cast-down of any of the party. He sat by
himself not speaking to any one, and with an air of discontent, put away
the food which was brought to him. "The poor lieutena
Hello,
* Richard Kenner wrote on Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:18:10PM CEST:
> > That means, we at our option can choose to release under GPL v3,
> > exclusively, if we wanted.
>
> I disagree, as I said.
>
> My interpretation of that sentence is that "when you redistribute
> this, you must give the p
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Andrew Haley wrote:
> The test tells us whether the back-end has atomic builtins. If it doesn't
> then we generate calls to the libgcj back end. I really don't want gcj
> to generate calls to nonexistent __compare_and_swap_4 or somesuch.
Maybe not to nonexistent functions,
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 09/10/2010 11:50 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
>> There is just one front-end file left that still has to #undef
>> IN_GCC_FRONTEND, allowing the front end to include RTL headers. The
>> one remaining file is java/builtins.c.
>>
>> In java/b
On 09/10/2010 11:50 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> There is just one front-end file left that still has to #undef
> IN_GCC_FRONTEND, allowing the front end to include RTL headers. The
> one remaining file is java/builtins.c.
>
> In java/builtins.c there are (what appear to be) functions that
> gene
On 09/11/2010 08:08 PM, Flex Ferrum wrote:
> for (auto i: {1, 2, 3, 4, 5})
> {
> std::cout << i << " ";
> }
>
It works fine already, see also the new testcase range-for6.C. Unless
you mean something else entirely and I'm not getting your point...
Paolo.
Hello.
It is a great effort to implement 'range-based for' in gcc 4.6. But it
could be interesting for you what recent C++0x standard draft (N3126)
contains some significant change for this feature:
--- begin quote --
6.5.4 The range-based for statement [stmt.ranged]
1 The For a rang
> Well, the words on their distribution say exactly this:
>
> GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
> the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later
> version.
>
>
arg..well, I had replaced xmalloc with alloca, leading to some of the garbage
below, but
I am indeed still running afoul of the garbage collector.
I don't know if that is my original problem but I should probably fix this
first.
ie: now that I'm using -enable-checking, and I think it collects e
> I kind of suspect it might be a type mismatch, overwriting part of a tree node
configure -enable-checking:
?"Bmr?: In function 'FPrint__xCombine':
`?"Bmr?:13:0: internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have
var_decl in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1950
and some other pro
* FX wrote on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:08:10PM CEST:
> I'm CC'ing the gcc list so I can get insight from people who
> understand correctly how static libraries should be handled by the
> driver...
>
> > I'm seeing a similar issue with -static linkage.
> >
> > % gfc4x -o z norm2_3.f90 -L/usr/home/s
Il 11/09/2010 1.42, Steve Kargl ha scritto:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:05:23AM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
Il 10/09/2010 19.31, Steve Kargl ha scritto:
The ideal solution would be incorporating libquad into libgfortran
The ideal solution would be building GCC enabling QP with
./configure..
23 matches
Mail list logo
